8-16-07 Supreme Court Decision
From the July 31, 2007 Sound
Two weeks ago I received a letter
stating the Supreme Court denied the case. I'm not surprised. I realized
the Supreme Court was corrupt when certain decisions they kept pushing out was
condemned by the public, and denying the case of Lewis Perdue, who Dan Brown
blatantly STOLE SEVERAL HUNDRED COPYRIGHTED ITEMS FROM to make the Da
Vinci Code book. Perdue copyrighted and published his books 20 years before Dan
Brown stole them.
The courts side with the money
coming into the Treasury, not justice. Besides, the Supreme Court only takes
cases they feel will get their faces in the paper. They are not following Rule
If they can grant Anna Nicole
Smith's case, where her abandoned husband expressly left her out of his billion
dollar will, for how she married him then took off, with the Justices going
against the man's wishes, to give her another shot at stealing a family's
fortune in court that she did not earn nor was she entitled to, then in the next
breath deny petitions from people on death row whose lives are at stake
and are emphatically stating they have been wrongfully sentenced to death, it
says they are corrupt. You're better off giving your money to charity than
filing a case with them ($400 fee).
Not only are the preparation
requirements for filing unnecessarily stringent and insufferable (do you know
how many printing companies I took my petition to with the Supreme Court's
instructions, that kept asking me, "what is wrong with these people," "why do
they want all that?" and "what does that mean," for requesting such a layout and
From the double sided printing on
irregular sized paper, to the expensive 65 pound card stock paper they require,
to the particular binding and excessive amount of copies (40 for the Supreme
Court, plus 3 for each defendant) they aren't paying attention to justice
matters, requesting all that, then churning out corruption on top of it.
They have another agenda and a
corrupt one (for further reference see the race based school initiative designed
to level the playing field, that the Supreme Court shotdown a few weeks ago,
which drew condemnation in Congress).
Justices Alito and Roberts,
you know the one that fell 10 feet this week, hit his head, was foaming at the
mouth, had a seizure and was hospitalized, abstained from my case, according to
the letter I received from the Supreme Court.
But I do think he slipped and
bumped his head metaphorically as well, as the popular phrase goes, as he is
responsible for that corrupt court and that's a cowardly, spineless, wimpy cop
out. It screams corruption. You've protected the criminals and it is duly
reflected in my forthcoming book and will be as well in my film about the case.
I guess them abstaining is supposed
to absolve them of guilt, in that a person has been abused, assaulted on the
same street as a U.S. court house, criminally defrauded out of billions in
Copyrights that were devalued by lawbreaking stars and Hollywood executives,
with her privacy and that of her family vilely violated, all in relation to the
same case (Anthony Pellicano style), in your metaphorical house, on your watch,
but you willfully ignored it, so you're not responsible, though you are the head
of the court. Right. God don't like ugly, as the phrase goes and people reap
what they sow.
Not to worry, the international
lawsuits are going to begin soon. They will be handled by lawyers and run as
long as they need to, in as many venues as they need to, to get this matter
resolved. So this thing is truly just getting started. Updates of developments
in the case will be posted to the web site.
The UN complaint will be posted
first and shortly.
I've also finished the book
Justice And Truth, which is about the case and everything's in it. It's 200
plus pages and lays bare what happened, in all its ugly detail, blow by blow,
including the massive corruption that allowed and condoned these very serious
crimes, that goes further than I have made public (the UN complaint will reveal
some of said additional crimes shortly, then the book fully). It's a real eye
opener and you will never look at the system the same again after reading it.
Since the Supreme Court's corrupt
conduct, Madonna and some of the defendants from the case, have interpreted it
as free rein to steal more copyrights, which they did, but I am asking you to
keep boycotting them. I will post the recently announced forthcoming
infringements I've found shortly.
Since the boycott began in 2005,
the albums and films stolen and listed on here as such, have all flopped. Thanks
to all who boycotted them. They have lost far more than they have gained through
breaking the law at my expense. Stealing from my Copyrighted Catalog has been
costing them money and their credibility, as attested by numerous items online
about the case.
Warner Music Group, the main
offender that Madonna records for, has seen their stock price go from $25 a
share to $12 a share and declining. Madonna's album flopped, Kelly Clarkson's
album that has lyrics from my Copyrighted Catalog illegally strewn all over it
flopped and she was forced to cancel her tour due to poor ticket sales, Hillary
Duff's album flopped, Stefani's album did poorly, falling out of the charts and
failing to yield a real hit, Beyonce's re-release CD/DVD with the infringing
music videos and songs bombed and was then pulled, and Rihanna's album has
flopped, as it has been out for months, run out of steam and has not even
crossed gold when they were expecting double platinum, leaving Def Jam
disappointed (airplay can be manipulated, as the payola scandal of 2006
JAY Z'S UPSET OVER RIHANNA'S
POOR ALBUM SALES
"[Def Jam] has already sent out
emails and made phone calls to producers and writers looking for a new female
act to sign - to restart what failed with Teairra Marie and Rihanna. Everyone
over here is really disappointed in Rihannas lackluster album sales. Considering
that umbrella has been number one for so long and received so much positive
feedback from radio, we thought it would should have done much better than
160,000 first week." - MTO
6-13-07 Copyright Office Fraud Follow Up
of Holy Moly web site
Yes, again. This is a follow
up to my article yesterday about another incident of Copyright Office Fraud.
Office Fraud" "Copyright
Office Fraud Update" and "Copyright
Office Commits Fraud Again").
Please read that article to
get up to speed, if you haven’t already, regarding Madonna, who I sued,
infringing copyrights of mine that temporarily and fraudulently lost US
copyright protection under suspicious circumstances, that later had to be
reinstated by Copyright Office supervisors.
Yesterday, shortly after that
post, I called Copyright Office supervisor Brenda Roseboro to inquire as to what
their explanation was for this latest incident.
She blamed it on the sorting
machines at the Copyright Office, stating my money order probably got separated
from my Copyright registration.
She said she will “do a check
for loose checks” and even if she doesn’t find it there, she will ask her boss
to comp it, considering I have proof of payment and postage that is tracked,
which I read to her over the phone.
She apologized again and gave
me another tracking number and told me to send the copyright submission back
that was fraudulently returned to me claiming I didn’t send the $45.00 fee, when
That settles this incident for
now, but there is a greater underlying issue in this case that cannot and will
not be ignored.
It gives the appearance that
certain parties in Hollywood are trying to get some of my Copyrights thrown out
and are making illegal attempts to thwart the dates of authorship through
illegal connections, so when they later steal and infringe it after they
illegally access and copy it, they can try to claim they registered it first,
when they did not.
As I wrote yesterday, the
Copyright Office is not my only legally accepted source of protecting my works,
so certain parties in Hollywood are in for a nasty shock.
But in the mean time, Madonna
and co., continue to disgrace and corrupt the judiciary and Congress to
everyone, in a case that is being viewed by millions around the globe.
It goes to show that money
corrupts some people and only a low class low life with money would seek such
sick means at any cost to steal what does not belong to them.
It has been duly recorded and
is being duly watched.
After an unprecedented 22 plus
copyright infringement and fraud lawsuits against her from credible people all
over the world, all telling the same story, who don’t even know each other, does
Madonna really think people believe her anymore.
6-12-07 Copyright Office Commits Fraud Again
A follow up on my June 4, 2007
Judiciary Report articles "Copyright
Office Fraud" and its June 8, 2007 follow up "Copyright
Office Fraud Update." Yesterday, I received a package in
the mail from the Copyright Office postmarked June 3, 2007. In it was a
copyright submission I sent in on March 30, 2007, fraudulently returned to me once again.
This time they are claiming I
didn't send payment with a copyright titled AISHA WORK 28, which is an error I
have never made in over 15 years of copyrighting, when I did send the full
payment of $45.00 via postal order number: 10719116752 via tracked mail no: 03061070000141804786
in that March 30, 2007 package. All documents pertaining to this and the
other two incidents will be posted on the site shortly.
Isn't it great to know this type of
lack of integrity exists within an offshoot of Congress. The contents of this
copyright was properly preserved and registered with its authorship already
established and protected in several ways.
Therefore, this latest attempt at
fraud only provides more evidence and serves to illustrate the points I have been making, regarding the
rampant dishonesty and lack of integrity present in this case, in certain
parties trying to destroy some of my valuable copyrights, so money hungry
parties in Hollywood can illegally use them in violation of domestic and
This latest incident has been duly
noted and added as additional evidence in my UN complaint and for the
It doesn't look good on them, as
this is the third time something of this fraudulent nature has happened,
highlighting a very serious problem in Congress that copyright holders all over the world
need to take note of.
6-7-07 Info About Press Release
It appears the Madonna
has been complaining about my latest press release to the sites that run it, due
to the number of hits it's been getting.
They don't want people knowing
about the case...or the continued misconduct they are engaging in that there is
irrefutable proof of. Even her fans gave up defending her many months ago and
stopped emailing me because with all the new evidence that kept coming out, they
realized she's done something very wrong. They stopped emailing me, whining a
long time ago.
The only one still emailing me
defending Madonna under different names is the commissioned hacker from the
legal case. 10 - 15 emails from the same person using different names, does not
count as complaints, but as craziness (same IP address, range and writing
He's done what he is doing to the
PR sites to my site before, sending a few dozen threatening, angry, crazy emails
under different names (same IP). And that's when he isn't trying to hack my site
offline so no one can read the case files.
Let the public decide for
themselves based on the facts and evidence in the case, not reliant upon
anyone's waning celebrity. There is such a thing as free speech in the world,
where people are allowed to express via spoken and written word, the injustices
that transpire against them. Why should you be the only one to air your side of
the story, when you are the one breaking domestic and international privacy and
And considering Madonna and co.
have a few dozen legal cases all over the world from different credible people,
for invasion of privacy and willfully stealing copyrights and trademarks after
other parties had authored and legally registered them, says there is a problem
and that she is the liar. If you don't want people writing about your
misconduct, don't commit it then. It's that simple.
It is pretty sick and pathetic that
anyone would seek to suppress and cover up such abhorrent conduct. It says they
did something wrong and have something to hide. If you're arrogant enough to
commit misconduct, be bad enough to own up to it. Stop being a coward.
The information is out there.
People know about the case and what you've been doing. It's too late. Get over
it. Credible, professional people from different walks of life have read the
case evidence and slammed you for what you're doing. I am going to post a
substantial amount of additional evidence shortly, since they continue to try to
suppress the case.
6-5-07 Defendant Disney
Criminally Steals Another Script From My Catalog
A new criminal copyright infringement of my work, has just been
announced by Disney, who has been a defendant in the case, since 2005. It’s
called “All About Adam” which is a criminally obtained rip off of one of my
already copyrighted Biblical comedies. I am asking you to boycott this film when
it comes out. Any changes to the title or anything with the project and I will
let you know, so you can know which project it is to boycott. They are still
criminally using items from the catalog in flagrant violation of domestic and
United Nations laws.
Disney Films has been a visitor to this site on numerous
occasions for years now well BEFORE and after the case was filed against them,
meaning they’ve been targeting me for some time now and in violation of SEC
rules. They have racked up thousands of hits to the site that I will post the
data for shortly:
Disney nabs 'All About Adam'
Studio purchases Schoolcraft, Simons
By MICHAEL FLEMING
Disney has made a preemptive
six-figure purchase of "All About Adam," a spec script by Alan Schoolcraft and
Brent Simons. Scott Rudin will produce the project.
Spec follows the biblical Adam as he
trails Eve to modern-day Gotham after they have a lover's quarrel. Adam
discovers Satan was behind the breakup.
Deal marks the second significant spec
sale for the writers; DreamWorks Animation previously snatched up "Mastermind."
That project has Ben Stiller attached to produce, with Cameron Hood and Kyle
Jefferson to direct. They helmed the DreamWorks Animation 3-D short "First
Copyright Office Fraud
Here is an excerpt
from my United Nations human rights abuse complaint, related to the legal case
Aisha v. Madonna, that was delivered to the appropriate party to file. This
excerpt is regarding copyright office fraud that I've encountered twice:
COPYRIGHT OFFICE FRAUD
"As Section 12 of this complaint
illustrates, I am the owner of dozens of copyright certificates from the Library
of Congress in Washington, DC.
While all my works are securely
copyrighted, a copyright submission titled AISHA WORK 19, was returned to me,
via fraud, by Copyright Office Supervisor Brenda Roseboro.
In a Copyright Office letter dated
February 28, 2007, postmarked by the U.S. Mail service on Friday, March 2, 2007
and received by me on Monday, March 5, 2007, it stated I only sent in $30 for
this particular copyright and that the rates were just raised that very month to
In a letter dated May 7, 2007,
Copyright Office Supervisor Brenda Roseboro, committed fraud, via writing that
she sent me a letter on August 31, 2006, stating I had remitted the copyright
registration fee accompanying AISHA WORK 19, $15 short and to send the
additional funds in the amount of $15 within 60 days.
She did nothing of the sort. The
letter she sent me flagging AISHA WORK 19 for being $15 short, due to the
Copyright Office increasing fees that same month I sent in that registration for
the copyright AISHA WORK 19, was DATED February 28, 2007, NOT August 31, 2006 as
she claimed in her letter.
Furthermore, I remitted the
additional $15 requested, within the allotted time, via a U.S. postal order, no
10720786544 and sent it via U.S. mail that is stamped and marked with a record
of having been sent and on time.
Ms. Roseboro's deeds constitutes
fraud of the highest order, as the Copyright AISHA WORK 19 is worth a
significant amount of money.
Prior to sending in the copyright
registration AISHA WORK 19, I purchased ICANN internet names for the copyrighted
songs and scripts in the project, as well as securing the copyright via other
AISHA WORK 19 is also embedded in
other copyrights that were approved, unbeknownst to Ms. Roseboro. The works are
thoroughly registered in multiple ways and protected under domestic and
However, this was another blatant
attempt at trying to get rid of one of my Copyrights, to pave the way for
uncreative, lawbreaking parties in Hollywood to use it in violation of the U.S.
Code and United Nations laws.
This misconduct transpired once
before, via U.S. Copyright Office employee Robert Blakenburg, mentioned in the
lawsuit Aisha v. Madonna, who told me over the phone, "You can't sue Warner
Bros" which is Madonna's record label, without me even telling him I was suing
them. He further fraudulently and menacingly told me items really "Aren't
copyrightable and anyone is free to use your works." If that is the case, what
is the purpose of having a Copyright Office.
Mr. Blakenburg fraudulently flagged
one of my copyright registration submissions and did not send out the required
Copyright Office letter stating what he had done. Copyright Office rules mandate
any works flagged by a Copyright Office agent must be accompanied by a letter
sent to the registrant notifying them of the work being flagged and giving them
the standard 120 days to make corrections and or answer the questions the
copyright agent had with their registration submission.
After the 120 days elapses without
a response from the registrant, the copyright registration can be thrown out and
the registrant loses all rights to their work.
Mr. Blakenburg, threw out that
copyright registration without even sending the letter, which constitutes fraud
under the U.S. Code, as it was a valuable copyright.
I had to complain to his supervisor
to have the works reinstated. She apologized and reinstated the copyright.
It is disgraceful that the Library
of Congress, which exists as apart of the U.S. Congress, would resort to such
tactics to defraud a minority and an immigrant, because parties in Hollywood
have designs on a valuable copyrighted work that does not belong to them.
However, tellingly, W-------- (name
withheld from the internet until investigations are completed), mentioned
previously in this complaint, who had placed harassing phone calls to my home,
threateningly stated to me over the phone months prior to this incident
regarding Ms. Roseboro, that the labels in the lawsuit, "Have people at the
Copyright Office who backdate things for them." Months later, Ms. Roseboro
did just that on a copyright that Madonna is currently infringing in association
with her partners in Hollywood.
However, unbeknownst to her, the
work was lawfully protected, registered and imbedded in other copyrights I own
as well, all pre-dating her willful thefts and that of her associates.
Such conduct does not belong in
Congress, as it is not the principles the United States was founded upon."
5-19-07 Press Release:
Madonna Steals Song "Hey You" For Live Earth
Madonna Steals Song "Hey You"
For Live Earth
Miami, Florida, May 19, 2007 - on
May 3, 2007, Aisha released a free song titled “Thieves” via her web site
www.aishamusic.com, about Madonna and the copyright infringement legal case
Aisha v. Madonna, which was filed with the Supreme Court in April 2007 (case no.
06-1389). Press releases were issued that were carried on several press sites
two weeks ago.
Two weeks later, on May 16, 2007,
Madonna has mimicking released a free song titled “Hey You,” where she further
unlawfully stole items from Aisha’s private, unreleased, Copyrighted Catalog,
valued at billions due to its sheer voluminous content, which contains 9,000
songs, 300 movie scripts and short stories, 15 book manuscripts, 200 music video
treatments, 500 photographs, 150 photo treatments, a perfume line and clothing
Additional litigation will be
brought over the song “Hey You” by Madonna, which was illegally released through
Aisha stated, “I know my words when
I see them and these items were copyrighted long ago before she infringed them
this week. Once again, she has stolen copyrighted material that does not belong
to her. She is unequivocally the most unoriginal artist in the history of music.
How can one claim to be doing charity work, for which one has stolen that which
is being contributed. Only a fraud would do that. Not to mention, the song
sounds bad due to her singing. The hot air that is her thin, squeaky, wobbly
voice will not help climate change.”
A formal complaint was filed with
George W. Bush appointees Alberto Gonzales at the DOJ and FBI Director Robert
Mueller in September of 2005, as copyright infringement is a crime the FBI
However, Mueller has shirked his
duties once again, as he was publicly noted to have done in the Mark Foley
congressional page scandal, where another famous figure was involved. The
Inspector General excoriated the FBI for this conduct, under Robert Mueller.
Aisha stated, “Mueller’s criminal
negligence in this case in allowing Madonna to continue to illegally use years
old copyrights on a regular basis, speaks terribly of him and his abilities as
chief law enforcement officer of the country. It stands to reason, if he can’t
stop Madonna, how’s he going to stop Osama. They need to listen to Congress and
the American people and step down for the sake of the country.”
Aisha was the first to break the
story in her December 2006 internet based Sound Off Column about the FBI abusing
the Patriot Act via improperly obtaining emails, bank statements and phone
records of American and international citizens. Three months later, Aisha’s
claims in her Column were confirmed when in March 2007 IOG Glenn Fine wrote of
FBI abuses of the Patriot Act regarding emails, banks statements and phone
records, resulting in a recent Senate inquiry.
The local Miami FBI, run by
Jonathan Solomon, stated they are investigating the criminal copyright
infringement and invasion of privacy case Aisha v. Madonna. However, this has
not stopped Madonna and her associates from unlawfully continuing to pilfer the
contents of Aisha’s preexisting, private, Copyrighted Catalog that was proven to
have been procured by them via illegal means, in making an unauthorized copy of
the master file, with additional items stolen from Aisha’s publicly viewed web
Aisha further stated, “An illegal
copy of my Copyrighted Catalog was made and she continues to unlawfully use
items from it, attributing them to herself and her associates in violation of
U.S., British and United Nations laws. She has illegally passed around and sold
items from my Copyrighted Catalog to other parties in the industry, who have
been tied to her via business records and tax records, as well as stealing items
for herself and her companies in violation of SEC laws, that govern each
UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS
A United Nations human rights abuse
complaint has been prepared and will be filed with the U.N. via an assigned
international representative. Aisha’s human rights have been violated in respect
to her copyrights, property ownership and privacy, which has been invaded in the
same manner that other victims experienced in the Anthony Pellicano case.
Anthony Pellicano is Madonna’s
lawyer’s now incarcerated private investigator. The contents of the human rights
abuse report will be posted to the Internet shortly via Aisha’s web site.
COMPARATIVE LYRICAL CONTENT OF
THE INFRINGEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE SONG “HEY YOU” BY MADONNA TO AISHA’S
PREEXISTING COPYRIGHTS THAT ARE YEARS OLD:
Aisha: don’t give up
Madonna: don’t you give up
Aisha: Life isn’t so bad
Madonna: It’s not so bad
Aisha: A chance for you - give us a
Madonna: There’s still the chance for us
Aisha: the courage to be yourself
Madonna: just be yourself
Aisha: poet and peacemaker
Madonna: poets and prophets
Aisha: Tell me why you act so shy
Madonna: Don’t be so shy
Aisha: There's a reason people have
so much difficulty
Madonna: There’s reasons why it’s hard
Aisha: Make it together
Madonna: Keep it together
Aisha: we'll make it anyway
Madonna: we’ll make it alright
Aisha: But will you change, you’ve
got to beat this thing
Madonna: You’ve got to change this time
Aisha: Remember this
Madonna: Remember this
Aisha: Is real, It’s more than
something you feel
Madonna: None of it’s real including the way you feel
Aisha: Save your soul
Madonna: Save your soul
Aisha: little sister
Madonna: little sister
Aisha: Save your soul
Madonna: Save your soul
Aisha: little Brother
Madonna: little brother
Aisha: Save yourself the pain
Madonna: save yourself
Aisha: learn to love yourself
Madonna: first love yourself
Aisha: courage to love someone else
Madonna: then you can love someone else
Aisha: I can’t change everyone
Madonna: If you can change someone else
Aisha: save everyone else
Madonna: saved someone else
Aisha: it’s a choice you make
Madonna: You’ve got a choice
Aisha: everything makes sense
Madonna: it will make sense
Aisha: learn to love yourself
Madonna: first love yourself
Aisha stated, “Madonna is famous
for taking other people’s songs, changing a line or two, then taking full
writer’s credit and financial compensation for something she did not write.
That’s called stealing and fraud. Thanks to her, we now have the unenviable task
of monitoring all new releases, checking for people she illegally sold items
from my Catalog to, in order to bring future lawsuits to get my work back.”
Madonna’s many copyright
infringement, civil rights violations and breach of contract cases illustrate a
pattern of misconduct that has spanned five countries:
1. Aisha v. Madonna (civil rights
and copyright infringement)
2. Sorrentino v. Madonna (assault and battery on a 10 year old child)
3. Myers v. Madonna (civil rights violations)
4. Ronald J Myers v. Madonna (civil rights violations)
5. Barrier v. Madonna (civil rights violations)
6. Bourdin v. Madonna (copyright infringement)
7. Easy Street Records v. Madonna (copyright infringement)
8. Acquaviva v. Madonna (copyright infringement)
9. D’Onofrio v. Madonna (copyright infringement)
10. Iving L Williams v. Madonna (copyright infringement)
11. Eon Net LP v. Madonna (copyright /patent/trademark infringement)
12. Rich Kidd Music Publishing, Inc. v. Madonna (copyright infringement)
13. Winterland v. Madonna (copyright infringement)
14. Hobe Cie. LTD v. Madonna (trademark infringement)
15. Coppola v. Madonna (personal injury)
16. Rice v. Madonna (breach of contract)
17. Mclay v. Madonna (breach of contract)
18. Nike, Inc. v. Madonna (breach of contract)
19. Millennium Films v. Madonna (breach of contract)
20. Done and Dusted v. Madonna (breach of contract)
FULL LIST OF ALLEGED
The following is a list of works
from Aisha’s aforementioned Copyrighted Catalog that she formally alleged
Madonna and her affiliates such as Warner Bros Pictures, Warner Bros Records,
Warner Bros’ artists like Paris Hilton and Madonna's cousin, Gwen Stefani, among
others Madonna does business with, have unlawfully used, in the ongoing
infringements of her copyrights.
Defendants in the case who have
already been sued in the 2005 Aisha v. Madonna lawsuit that was recently filed
with the Supreme Court, continue to infringe more of Aisha’s works, such as Sony
for Beyonce and Interscope for Gwen Stefani, who has stolen from Aisha’s
Copyrighted Catalog two albums in a row now, reaping millions in illegal profit.
1. Princess Diaries 2 (2005)
2. Prince And Me 1 & 2 (2005)
3. Sam’s Lake (2005)
4. Gravedancers (2005)
5. Material Girls (2006)
6. Valentine’s Day (2006)
7. American Dreamz (2006)
8. Goal (2006)
9. My Sister’s Keeper (2006)
10. Blond Ambition (2007)
11. Rude Buay (2007) being used by Madonna’s husband Guy Ritchie (his fourth
infringement lawsuit since he has been with her).
12. Tonight He Comes (2007)
13. “American Life” song by Madonna (2003)
14. “Orange County Girl” by Madonna’s cousin Gwen Stefani (2006)
15. “Confessions On A Dance Floor” CD by Madonna (2005)
16. A backdrop from Madonna's Re-invention world tour (2004)
17. A backdrop from Madonna's Confessions world tour (2006)
18. "Sorry" Music video by Madonna (2005)
19. “Stars Are Blind” music video by Madonna's fellow Kaballah Centre member and
Warner Bros artist Paris Hilton (2006)
20. Madonna's fellow Kaballah Centre member Britney Spears’ “Streams Of
Consciousness” column, ripped off my “Sound Off Column” - both bearing the same
initials and written content that Spears plagiarized years after my Column was
copyrighted, indexed and established online.
21. Items from my clothing line have been illegally used for Madonna's English
Roses clothing line (2005)
22. Items from my clothing line are illegally being used for Madonna's H&M line
23. December 2006's "Beauty Buyble" by Judith Regan's Regan Books, who was
behind Madonna's 1990's "Sex" book.
24. E’s 2007 “Boulevard Of Broken Dreams”
25. “Dandelions” by Madonna’s fellow Kabbalah Center member Nicole Richie
26. “Where Is Your Dignity” “Burned” and “Happy” by Hillary Duff, who starred in
Madonna’s infringing film she stole from my Catalog, “Material Girls”
27. “Hollaback Girl” by Madonna’s cousin Gwen Stefani (2005)
28. “Worldwide Woman,” “Amor Gitmo” and “Welcome To Hollywood” by Beyonce
29. “Beautiful Liar,” “Suga Mama,” “Greenlight,” “Flaws and All” and “Still In
Love” low budget music videos by Beyonce (2007)
30. “Umbrella” by Rihanna
31. “Can I Live” by Nick Cannon (2005)
32. My Super Ex-Girlfriend (2006)
33. “Never Again” by Kelly Clarkson (2007)
34. “Hey You” by Madonna (2007)
35. A verbatim theft of a specific cultural joke in “Charlie And The Chocolate
Factory” (2005), stolen from Aisha’s 1998 copyrighted script “Presidential
Dreams.” “Charlie And The Chocolate Factory” was produced by Brad Pitt’s Plan B
Entertainment. Brad Pitt starred in Guy Ritchie’s box office bomb “Snatch” which
was also the subject of a copyright infringement lawsuit. Since he has been with
Madonna, different litigants have sued Guy Ritchie 4 separate times for
copyright infringement, over the projects “Snatch” “Swag” “Lock Stock And Two
Smoking Barrels” and in the legal case Aisha v. Madonna for pilfering items from
4-17-07 Radio Interview,
Press Releases, Forthcoming Articles
I did a radio interview with
mainstream Jamaican radio station ZIP-103 this afternoon. They were
really nice and said Jamaica is behind me in the case.
Hopefully we can get a copy of the interview to put on the
web site. I’ve been doing interviews with Jamaican outlets,
because my dad knows people there. And even in American born
Sophia Stewart’s copyright infringement case against Warner
Bros, among others, for stealing her copyrighted script and
using it for the Matrix (my case is against Warner as well),
according to published international reports, Warner
Bros, the biggest media company in America, managed “a
complete press blackout in America,” in attempts to hide
the story and what’d they’d done in disgracefully ripping
off the New York born Christian writer, Stewart, to the tune
Only the international media, for
years have trumpeted her valid case that a questionable
judge threw out of court (see a pattern yet - the fate of
all copyright cases against Warner Bros - which warrants a
In light of that, my family sought
the international press to avoid the unbalanced Warner media
manipulation that is not only unconstitutional and
one-sided, but is also pathetic. If you do something, at
least be man enough to own up to it – and Madonna is a dude.
Another international newspaper article should appear
shortly regarding the case. As I said a week ago, my family
and I are doing this to create awareness with the hopes of
putting a stop to all the misconduct being committed against
us that has gotten sicker. As I said before, some vile human
rights abuses have been committed against us that have been
tied to the defendants. We will discuss it shortly.
A press release was just released as well, and it’s
available in Google News and on several sites:
Supreme Court petition
For press release also available on web site
4-8-07 Observer Article About
The Case, New Infringements Found
There is an article available in the Observer
newspaper today regarding the Madonna lawsuit I
filed. My family and I decided to take to the press,
as the misconduct against us has not desisted one
iota and is growing increasingly worse. You can read
to Pat and the Observer. The FBI has twice said they
are investigating the case. But while the FBI are
investigating, Madonna and co. are trying to use
as much of my Copyrighted Catalog as possible
which contains 9,000 songs, 300 movie scripts and
short stories, a few hundred music video treatments,
15 book manuscripts and hundreds of photo
treatments. The Catalog is worth billions and
Madonna and her partners in Hollywood know this.
like her company Warner Bros made 2 BILLION off of
stealing the script for THE MATRIX from a
black Christian New Yorker, Sophia Stewart, who
copyrighted it years before they stole it - with
the FBI even finding her script was used to prepare
the film and was present on set of THE MATRIX.
illegally made millions off of these verbatim rip
off infringements of my copyrights that predate
theirs by years, via illegally accessing my
Copyrighted Catalog. Two separate computer companies
confirmed the illegal computer intrusions. She has
absolutely no conscience whatsoever and that
Kaballah cult of hers has a long history of doing
this very type of mischief, as does she.
Never mind her
lawyer is at the center of an FBI probe for
wiretapping, harassment and identity theft, three
things I sued them for as well, before the FBI and
DOJ ever went public with the case against Anthony
Pellicano, the misconduct against us still continues
unabated and has grown sicker with each month that
passes by. All of the details have not been made
As for the
illegal wiretapping, evidence and affidavits will be
presented to support those claims.
commissioned misconduct, every week it's something
else, all of which has not been made public yet, but
will be shortly.
My family and I
are currently looking for international lawyers in
Jamaica and London to pursue the case, due to the
sheer corruption I have encountered, with misconduct
that runs far deeper than any of you could imagine.
We have not gone public with the whole story and all
the evidence yet, but we will shortly. Like I said a
few weeks ago, Hollywood is a sick place.
JAY-Z AND RIHANNA
Just last week,
I lost 4 more music videos and 3 songs from my
Copyrighted Catalog to a 2005 defendant in the
Madonna lawsuit, SONY, who illegally used it for
Beyonce's re-release of her latest album B-Day.
PLEASE BOYCOTT BEYONCE'S CD AND DVD.
complained in the Sound Off Column about Madonna and
co’s conduct being racist/racism in exploiting
blacks, shortly after they started to illegally
spread and sell my copyrights to black artists who
are on labels in the lawsuit I filed in 2005.
still exploiting blacks and immigrants on top of it
to boot, who did you no harm. Criminally spreading
my copyrights to blacks on white labels doesn’t
change that and all the evidence points to Madonna
31, 2007, I announced the release of my album and a
few DVDs with several music videos and interviews to
go with it.
after, Beyonce and her Destinys Child robbing father
announced the very same, the re-release of her album
accompanied by many music videos, which she’s never
done before. Only the videos she filmed weren’t
hers. They were stolen from my Copyrighted Catalog
and her label SONY HAS BEEN A DEFENDANT IN THE
LAWSUIT SINCE 2005.
figured since the Florida judges in the case are so
corrupt (for further reference see the Anna
Nicole Smith case with Judge Korda and Seidlin),
throwing out a case without reading it, that they
can continue to steal as much as they like, because
the court system is in their back pocket, a terrible
pattern evident in their copyright cases. So much
for truth and justice.
continuing to criminally use items from my
Copyrights that they gained illegal access to via
hacking, with computer specialists confirming my
computers have been thoroughly hacked (CLICK
HERE FOR REPORTS) and my home also
sustained 5 burglaries where copyrighted computer
discs were stolen, which was reported to the Miami
Shores Police, who are waiting on the FBI (POLICE
REPORTS POSTED SOON).
RECORDS ALSO TIE BEYONCE TO THIS WEB SITE AS A SITE
Beyonce's "Greenlight" video – is a direct rip
off of the Contemporary Girl music video copyrighted
in April 2001. To see my certificate,
click here. My copyrighted 2001
music video treatment contained scenes, among
others, of me playing a white guitar, resting my
foot on the amp, playing a guitar keyboard, singing
into a silver mic and sitting on the drums, against
a white backdrop – all scenes present in Beyonce now
2007 “Greenlight” video 6 YEARS LATER.
doesn’t play the guitar or drums, I do, that’s why I
wrote it into the video. She looked stupid, awkward
and uncomfortable feigning playing the guitar and
sitting on the drums.
complaining that Beyonce’s new videos are cheap and
not what she usually does. It is for a reason, I am
an indie artist, I can’t afford expensive videos
right now. So some of what I have written for my
Copyrighted Catalog contains low budget indie
videos. That's my genre: indie music. I'm not on a
major label. Therefore, there are no Beyonce/P-Diddy
fireworks and explosion videos present right now.
in Love” “Flaws and All” and the “Beautiful Liar”
videos are direct rip-offs of videos I
copyrighted 3 YEARS AGO with the Library of
Congress. (COPYRIGHT CERTIFICATES POSTED SHORTLY).
"Amor Gitmo" by Beonyce is a rip off of
my 3 year old copyrighted song from 2004 titled “Amor
Perdido” that was on the site for years as
some of you will recall (LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
COPYRIGHT CERTIFICATE #PAu2-938-924, December 23,
2004 - CERTIFICATE POSTED SHORTLY).
Worldwide Woman is a rip off of my 2001 song
Contemporary Girl (CLICK
HERE FOR COPYRIGHT CERTIFICATE).
to Hollywood is also a rip off of an unreleased
old Copyrighted song from my Copyrighted Catalog. It
predates their copyrights as well by years
(COPYRIGHT CERTIFICATE POSTED SHORTLY).
boyfriend Jay-Z’s is also featured on the infringing
"B-Day" re-release. One of my songs, Umbrella
COPYRIGHTED YEARS AGO has been altered from being an
inspirational song about God to being an
inspirational song about a man and mysteriously
surfaced on his now 2007 track, years later, with
Rihanna, also titled Umbrella, with
further rip offs from two other songs in my
Copyrighted Catalog. My songs were all registered
years before they have now been illegally accessed
and used, which is a federal and international
crime. Jay-Z has co-writer's credit for something
that has been criminally stolen. PLEASE BOYCOTT
RIHANNA'S SONG AND ALBUM.
Both Jay-Z and
Beyonce have also been sued numerous times
separately for stealing people’s songs and willfully
robbing people in not paying them for work and
services rendered. They have a long history of this
misconduct as well, as evidenced by PACER's U.S.
court system records.
3-17-07 New Infringement Found,
Madonna's Father On The Site, Hidden Camera Found In Home, DNS Hack
the Madonna lawsuit, I
found an additional infringement stolen from my
Copyrighted Catalog and illegally used to the tee,
to make the movie "My Super Ex-Girlfriend." Please
boycott this DVD. The copyright certificates and
side by side comparisons of all the thefts in the
case will be posted to the site shortly.
MADONNA'S FATHER ON
THE SITE - My web site statistics logged 116
visits from where Madonna's father works at General
Motors, which my dad called "suspicious," under the
circumstances. I agree.
BUGGING - With the
help of a counter surveillance company in Texas, a
hidden camera bug of the worst possible kind was
found in my home, which is pretty sick. It's
placement bears serious criminal implications of the
most severe kind
It was something some of the defendants in the case
said and did, that gave the game away and prompted the search for it.
Hollywood truly is a sick place, full of human scum.
My father in Jamaica is very angry at what has
happened, as am I. He was so disgusted and upset
when he found out about the latest invasion of
privacy, that it sent his pressure up, two days in a
row, sending him to the doctor, two mornings in a
This is how much what they are doing has affected
our family, which is why I sound off about them the
way I do in my Column. It's done nothing for my
mother's blood pressure either. Neither did the 5
break-ins in a short space of time to steal CD-ROMs
with offline and off computer newer copyrights on
them and to put only God knows the full extent of
what else, in our home, illegally.
How can any of this be right. The misconduct keeps
escalating, even though the government via Robert
Mueller of the FBI, who claims they are
investigating the case, and Alberto Gonzales of the
DOJ, who were both formally notified of what these
people have been doing to us in violation of
federal, international and UN laws, with their
office signing for the formal complaint
However, God doesn't
like ugly, as they are both under fire right now for
abuses of the Patriot Act, the very abuses that I
warned about regarding them in the Sound Off Column
for months, starting last year. Many people are now
calling for their resignation.
My family and I are working on something
to publicly address what's been happening, as it has
reached appalling levels worthy of U.N. condemnation
for serious human rights abuses.
Items from my already
copyrighted, forthcoming CDs and works listed on
this site, have been mysteriously appearing on
certain blogs, but attributed to Kaballah cult
members like Madonna, Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan.
I wrote a song about them last year, which is
copyrighted and unreleased, to be released soon, yet
saw items from it on three major blogs, which is
illegal. It has been duly noted and is now apart of
the investigation. Considering what I have
experienced in this case and witnessed firsthand, so
has the international community who is watching this
case, it is a damning testament that they are not
doing their jobs.
HACKING - They have also gotten a lot worse with the hacking, adding
wireless hacking to facilitate up to the minute
thievery. Part of what was hurting them in this case
is that my Copyrights are so old that it predates
their later illegally obtained and reregistered,
deliberate rip offs BY YEARS, which gave away what
they had and have been doing. The are sickly
determined to get the newer copyrights I author,
right as I type them on the screen, which is
DNS ATTACK ON
SERVER - I upgraded security on my computer a
week ago, to try to block out
hacker from the legal case from
tampering with the site. It worked for a little bit,
but then hours later after I published the updates
last week, without hacker interference for a change,
a telling thing happened.
My web site host Go
Daddy suffered a terrible Denial of Service attack,
that knocked my site offline from the internet and
slowed down and clogged up their email accounts for
hours. Go Daddy confirmed by email that this
happened on Sunday. A Denial of Service attack is a
hacker deliberately and fraudulently sending too
many requests at once to a server, to try to take a
web site offline illegally. This conduct is a
The Go Daddy site was
still online, but one of their servers with my site
on it, clearly the one targeted, was knocked
offline. Those of you who tried to access the site
last Sunday couldn't for several hours because of
the Denial of Service attack. The last time this
happened was when I asked the public to boycott
Madonna's rip off Confessions on a Dance Floor CD,
which later, according to Reuters, flopped in
My ISP confirmed the
hacker is hacking my computer from "another network
provider." One thing's for certain, all this
criminal mischief is coming from the same place and
bears the same pattern of textbook cult like
3-1-07 PLEASE BOYCOTT
Hillary Duff CD
a few more infringements I spotted recently. Three songs that I have read the
lyrics to, of 5, from Hillary Duff's forthcoming CD, bear serious infringements.
The songs are titled "Where's Your Dignity," "Happy" and "Burned" and are direct
rip offs of songs from my Copyright Catalog.
such a fraud, claiming she wrote them. The nerve of that phony little witch.
She's no better than the rest of the crooks in Hollywood, though she pretends to
be so innocent.
in the film Madonna and her company Maverick stole from my Copyrighted Catalog,
and changed the name from Contemporary Girl to Material Girl to Material Girls.
I wrote about it a few months ago on the lawsuit page.
Not to mention, Duff's new song
"With Love" rips off Sade's "Nothing
Come Between Us." So I guess she is now one of the industry's latest thieves.
2-6-07 PLEASE BOYCOTT New E! show "Boulevard Of Broken Dreams"
A new E! produced show titled "Boulevard Of
Broken Dreams" is a rip off of a documentary I copyrighted almost a year ago
titled "City Of Broken Dreams." The content and names of the projects are
extremely similar, containing duplicates, even focusing on the same stars. The
new E! knock off premiered last week and is about the same thing as my
documentary I copyrighted way before their show was even thought up and put into
Once again, Madonna is still criminally using my copyrighted catalog in willful, flagrant
violation of international law. My project is copyrighted and unreleased, but
they gained a copy of it through illegal hacking and used it in criminal
violation of the law (see hacking reports confirming how these copyrights are
being illegally access then used, as confirmed by computer specialists
I also bought the name for mine
back in the first week of July 2006. I filmed for it and worked on it
my trip to L.A. last June that I wrote about here. Here is the name
registration for my documentary film "City Of Broken Dreams" they ripped
off, from 7 months ago, registered in my company's name, Sonustar:
1-5-06 Another Rip Off Via A Madonna Business Tie Judith
Regan And Regan Books
BOYCOTT REGAN BOOKS
Please boycott the recently released book "Beauty Buyble" published by Madonna business associate Judith
Regan (she was behind Madonna's "Sex" Book), which is a sacrilegiously titled
rip off of one of my forthcoming books, "Beauty"
that's been copyrighted for over 2 years. "Beauty"
is a godly book I did on beauty that Judith's "Beauty Buyble" has ripped off to the tee, even disrespecting
my religion, Christianity, with that irreverent title, which they probably
thought was cute and funny. Guess God got the last laugh, cause Judith Regan
just got fired, is being international ripped to shreds with her reputation gone
over the O.J. Simpson book and TV special "If I Did It" that blew up in her
face. You proved the Bible right Judith. It says "God is not mocked" and "the
works of a man's hands come back to him. You're living proof of that.
Ms. Regan is clearly a woman with no morals or ethics. I
shouldn't be surprised that she feloniously bought a criminal rip off of my
forthcoming copyrighted book "Beauty" from the copyrights Madonna stole and has
been fencing around the industry, and put it out via Regan Books and News Corp.
If Ms. Regan read her
Buyble Bible, she would know God
doesn't bless unethical conduct. What comes around goes around...
Like profiting off a book that was criminal stolen from a
Copyrighted Catalog of works, and sold to you, with your full knowledge that you
were unlawfully buying an illegally procured version of unreleased pre-existing
And even worse, profiting off of a book and TV special that disrespects
viciously murdered victims, spitting on their caskets. That money is not gonna
do you and your family a drop of good, because it's blood money. It didn't do
Judas any good and it certainly won't do you any good either.
12-30-06 - Met Police Report I
Filed On 10/17/05
For A scanned copy of the complaint
I filed with the Met Police UK on October 17, 2005, alleging that Madonna and
the Sun Newspaper owned by News Group Newspapers, illegally wiretapped
my phones, hacked my computers, and printed the illegally obtained
contents therein via theft and harassment, constituting copyright infringement,
Several months after I filed the
complaint, the Met Police arrested one of News Group Newspaper editors on
charges he "wiretapped" and "hacked" the royal family - the very
same allegations I accused them of and sued them for months before the story
broke in regards to me. I feel somewhat vindicated that the editor has since
admitted he did indeed "wiretap" and "hack" the royal family,
showing a clear pattern of misconduct present at News Group Newspapers against
innocent, unsuspecting people.
12-04-06 - Defendant Gwen Stefani Steals More Music From This Web Site
PLEASE BOYCOTT GWEN STEFANI'S CD "SWEET
ESCAPE" BEING RELEASED THIS WEEK, AS IT CONTAINS MUSIC SHE STOLE FROM THIS SITE.
Before, where they ripped off
beats and melodies from my song Contemporary Girl, Gwen has now greedily gone
all the way and stole lyrics, more melodies and music from my song that was
copyrighted in 2001 for "Orange County Girl."
I will post the lyric
comparisons between my song and her rip off shortly along with my copyright
My godmother’s husband,
Clement Dodd, invented Jamaican reggae and ska music, which No Doubt exploited
and became rich off, despite their very basic skills.
Now it has extended to No
Doubt via Gwen Stefani exploiting Jamaicans, in criminally ripping off
copyrights from years of my labor to extend her run of fame. That song was
copyrighted in 2001, you criminal. Copyright infringement is a crime.
copyright certificate for "Contemporary Girl" from 2001
Below is Gwen
Stefani's illiterate, profanity laced, vulgar rip off of a Christian
song I wrote years ago, "Contemporary Girl," and dedicated to God. Yea,
look for more misfortune to hit your life than Herod for ripping of
something dedicated to God. Only trash does stuff like that and clearly
a devilish one as well with no morals. You disgust me - you an your
contemptible family of minority exploiting thieves. You nasty little
Once again, it is
produced by that thief defendant Pharrell Williams, who is known in the
industry for ripping off indie musicians then reselling their music for
$200,000, which is a crime. He and Stefani have criminally ripped me off
I've not heard her
whole garbage album yet, but I did hear "Orange County Girl" and
instantly spotted the rip offs, which are as follows. If you listen to
the songs, they are both sung the same, both have the same lyrics,
melodies, song structure and music under it - only I wrote and
copyrighted mine years ago in 2001.
The titles even sound
the same when you drop the Orange "Contemporary Girl" (2001) and "Orange
County Girl" (2006). Here are the lyrical comparisons that show they
blatant, lazy copying by that lazy, money grubbing, un-creative,
non-singing skank (I've put the ripped off lyrics in boldface to help
you see it easier):
Girl (2001) by Aisha
Orange County Girl (2006)
by Gwen Stefani
La La La
La La La
Living in this
I'm just an Orange County girl
Living in an extraordinary
Being an old
Isn't so bad
I'm an orange county
it's not so bad
And how long you've
on the best trip I've ever had
I know that's not
how you want to be
Tryin' to figure out
what I wanna be
wear the pants
figure out what I wanna be
sing it with me
And then the
With the life that
Hangin' at the
What are we thinking of
You know I come from
O.C. it's almost unheard of
So I'm gonna thank you all so much for this
Why ya wanna
I'm trippin' on the
best trip I've ever had
In Contemporary Girl
I write about the movie "Home Alone":
If you wanna be a feminist
Do it on your own
And you'll be like that movie
In Orange Country
Girl she writes about the movie
"The Sound Of Music":
These are a few of my favorite things
Still rolling 'cause the sound of music
In Contemporary Girl
I make reference to the weather in the form of Earthquakes in
California on the San Andreas fault, ironically where she is from:
"He shakes in the dust like you're
Then you bring out his faults"
In her rip off
Orange County Girl she makes reference to the weather in the form of
hurricanes and in "Miami" which has been my hometown for the past 22
"Set it on repeat, make a
Stefani says in her previous
rip off that she “ain’t no Hollaback girl.” You "ain’t no" girl either. You look
like a man. Well, according to some, you look like a horse:
Regarding the defendants in
the case, you are not good people. Good people don’ t do things like this and so
consistently. These aren’t errors or mistakes. These are premeditated, willful
violations of domestic and international law.
There’s absolutely no excuse
under the sun for this corrupt, mafia-like conduct. You are a disgrace to your
families and everyone associated with you.
You are money grubbing,
common, vulgar, low class whores that will do anything to stay in the spotlight,
even if it means criminally stealing from and exploiting others - adding
invasion of privacy to boot.
Only trash would do things
like that. You are as common and vulgar as they come.
People of class, who come from
any kind of decent family don’t do things like this. It says a lot about the
families you come from that you engage in this kind of criminal conduct and on a
You should learn from history.
People who do such things live under God’s disfavor and so do their families.
It’s dirty money that never will be made clean.
What kind of family did you
come from that they taught you that it is okay to rip off hard working
minorities to further your career? Were you raised in the gutter? Were you
raised by pigs? Are you that money hungry and pathetic?
Gwen Stefani says she is
related to Madonna and how they hang out all the time, and they are both money
hungry thieves whose desire to be rich and famous knows no bounds, so much so
that they’ve continued to break the law.
What a screwed up, immoral,
depraved gene pool they come from to be doing things like this. The invasion of
privacy is also very vile, much like they are.
I’ve found 5 separate civil
rights violations cases in court records against Madonna. Why is that? Different
people from around the country complaining she invaded their privacy.
It is clear that pervert has
been going around doing some really foul, criminal stuff and using PIs to break
Madonna also got sued for
civil rights violations along with well-known private eye Gavin DeBecker. And of
course, more corruption occurred in that case, as with 90% of her dozens of
cases. Her misconduct also caused Regis and Kelly to be sued in another case.
I’ve found many copyright
infringement cases in court records against her as well. Why is that. Why can’t
that lunatic behave.
I’ve found trademark and
patent infringement cases against her for stealing other people’s products. Once
again, why is that. Why can’t that lunatic behave.
She has so many
lawsuits against her for terrible, unlawful behavior, more than any other
artist, and that rubbish is being made to continue via a criminally negligent
Robert Mueller at the FBI. And in his criminal negligence in looking the other
way, it has empowered that idiot to go into other countries like England, Africa
and Jamaica and break the law.
In my lawsuit last year, I
complained of plagiarism in Madonna's children's books from my already copyrighted
works, and other invasion of privacy items.
She has gotten worse with this
latest book, fully proving my allegations, in "Too Good To Be True," as there is
more plagiarism from my unreleased copyrighted catalog of
songs and scripts in said children's
book, and once again, more oddness in that one of the characters in the book has
my father's name and another of the characters in the book bears one of my
mother's best friends' name. Sick! That is very disturbing. More on that in the
But wait, give that idiot 5
minutes, and look for her to say some rubbish lie in some interview about how
she came up with the stolen story line and characters' names in the book, that
mysteriously bear my dad's name and that of one of my mom's best friends, who has
been like an aunt to me for the past 20 years.
In 2003 I received a death threat
that was sent to this web site threatening to come to Miami and harm me (which
they later did in 2005, as listed in my lawsuit). According to Radar Magazine,
in 2006, the Kabbalah center phoned in a death threat to a reporter's private
cell phone as well for being too outspoken about their misdeeds. Using the IP address from the email death threat
sent to this site, I
traced it back to the same area as the Kabbalah cult in London. The hacks are
tracing back to that same general area in London as well. All while the head of the FBI,
Robert Mueller, sits on his butt and let these crimes continue.
11-09-06 - Scanned Post Office Delivery Confirmation For Robert
UPDATE: The page has been updated with the Post Office delivery
confirmation receipt for the original lawsuit and complaint sent to
Robert Mueller at the FBI in Washington, signed for by the FBI, a year
ago, which he failed to address, allowing further crimes to be committed
in the case, like he has done with other serious complaints sent to him
(see Foley page scandal and the C.R.E.W. evidence he sat on for 4 months
until publicly slammed for it, further reference).
So, Mueller's known about the case for a
year. One was sent to the DOJ as well.
The criminal misconduct Madonna has engaged in
the case I filed, as she has done to
numerous others who have sued her as court records reflect, to this day hasn't been
stopped by the FBI or DOJ. How is that crime prevention and law
enforcement, which is their job description?
CLICK HERE To view the Post Office confirmation receipt
that certifies that Mueller got the lawsuit and formal complaint letter
I sent, which was signed for by the FBI in Washington, yet one year
later, has not responded or stopped the crazy witch (another FBI office
responded, Minneapolis, due to a portion of the complaint I lodged with
the local FBI in Miami after Mueller didn't respond, reaching them).
Next up, the Supreme Court filing and
the corrupt judge's dismissal of the case ruling, Marcia Cooke, (you
know, the one where the sign in sheet shows she dismissed it the same
day she got it, clearly without reading it, as the case is 60 pages with
hundreds of pages of evidence and megabytes of CD ROM data, which she
could not have read and tended to her other court cases.
I will post a scanned copy of her
ruling, complete with a legal breakdown and links to other cases showing
what she slapped together and didn't even mail one of the pages of, (I
had to go to the court house and print off a copy - how efficient of
her), is legal garbage with no foundation in the Constitution, U.S. law
or United Nations law.
11-04-06 Scanned Reports Regarding Hackings, NY Daily News Trojans Report,
Sorry I took a few days to post the
following files. My main computer was hacked again with said hacker
corrupting the brand new scanner software, which coincidentally happened
right after I announced in the October 2006 Sound Off Column that I
would post the evidence scans of the computer specialists' reports.
Therefore, I had to uninstall and
reinstall the new software and scan the documents off line to prevent
further computer corruption of files/software. It's pathetic the lengths
they go to on a monthly basis when each Sound Off Column is posted, to
stop information regarding this case from coming out online to the
I've redacted my personal information from the scans:
Computer Specialists Reports On
CLICK HERE - I
called two different companies out to my home studio to run diagnostic
tests on my computers and both concluded they are being hacked. These
scans are a copy of the reports they gave me.
There are further diagnostic tests that found other evidence as well,
pointing to computer crimes. Further computer forensic tests will be
done shortly using extracted files of the copied hard drives. These
additional reports will be posted in the near future.
New York Daily News
Trojans Found On My Computer -
A program installed by the second computer specialist, identified two sources of
illegally entry to my computers as two New York Daily News files that was
allowing the hacker easy criminal access. As written on this page
previously, I sent another complaint to the FBI in April 2006, when a 5th
break-in to my home occurred with copyrighted CD-ROMs stolen, then items from
the CD ROMs surfacing a week and a half later, after I filed the police report,
attributed to Madonna in the New York Daily News, the same newspaper she and her
publicist placed a defaming article about me in October of 2005, the subject of
a forthcoming lawsuit against said newspaper, Lloyd Grove, Madonna and Liz
Rosenberg. For more background on that, read the Madonna Lawsuit section of the
September 2006 Sound Off Column.
FBI Letter About Identity Theft That Happened Via Computer
CLICK HERE - The letter
states my personal information and credit card information was compromised via
computer. Seeing as though I have never fallen for a "phishing" scam and never
did online banking, the only way said hacker could have gotten my personal
information and credit card info is hacking my computers, and as the above
computer specialists reports
show, my computers are being severely hacked, in a problem that has not
desisted. This method, hacking, is also how my unreleased copyrighted catalog of
over 8,000 songs, dozens of movie scripts, music video treatments and photo
treatments and a dozen book manuscripts, were illegally copied and criminally
used by Madonna and her various Hollywood partners.
Some items Mafioso Madonna criminally used verbatim
for herself (songs, music video treatments, book manuscripts) and her criminal
entity of a company Maverick Films and Maverick Records, while others she fenced
to her known affiliates and partners, via deeds that can all be traced back to
her via corporate filings, IRS records and numerous business files.
She fenced the more complicated scripts in my
catalog, that were big budget ("Princess Diaries 2," "American Dreams," "Tonight
He Comes," "Valentine's Day," "The Prince And Me" and "Goal") which little wack
Maverick Films couldn't produce, to her associates at studios who she has done
business with in the past, such as people at Universal, Columbia Pictures and
She used the smaller films Maverick could finance,
like my film "Contemporary Girl," which they made into "Material Girl," then
changed to "Material Girls" and now, the rip off Mrs. Guy Ritchie Jamaican/Miami
film "Rude Buay" (her husband's act of criminal theft, fraud and racketeering in
collusion with his wife Madonna) - all works stolen from my copyrighted catalog,
in vile acts of greed, avarice, criminal invasion of privacy and racketeering.
11-01-06 Another Hack
Update on the
Madonna Lawsuit: her commissioned hacker is still hacking my computer
and web site and has been resorting to corrupting the Firefox browser to get
access to my computer. He keeps hacking, corrupting and destroying the Firefox
application when I go online, deleting all the stored information, favorite sites list, passwords
and stored data. Each time he does this, Firefox and sometimes, Internet
Explorer gets corrupted as well, which allows him criminal access into my
computer to further break domestic and international law and illegally copy its
contents. Firefox Or IE, depending on which browser I'm using at the time
of the hack, will freeze up and I involuntarily lose control of the mouse.
In 2003 I received a death threat
that was sent to this web site threatening to come to Miami and harm me (which
they later did in 2005, as listed in my lawsuit). According to Radar Magazine,
in 2006, the Kabbalah center phoned in a death threat to a reporter's private
cell phone as well for being too outspoken about their misdeeds. Using the IP address from the email death threat
sent to this site, I
traced it back to the same area as the Kabbalah cult in London. The hacks are
tracing back to that same general area in London as well. All while the head of the FBI,
Robert Mueller, sits on his butt and let these crimes continue.
Computer Specialists Certify My Computers Are Being Hacked
As mentioned last month, two security companies certified that my computers
are being hacked. The following reports are about 2 computers. An HP from 2001
and a built computer from 2005, both have been used to create and store
unreleased Copyrights that Madonna got her dirty, money grubbing hands on and
Any specialist that looks at the computers or the extracted data comes to the
same conclusion, your computers are being hacked.
This is what the first computer specialist wrote:
(the "Computer Service America" company)
Critical state. 2 computers. Description below.
1. HP Pavilion 6830 - Has Trojan Horse.
MSconfigx32, Windows files corrupted. Unable to burn CDs. Crashes. Firewall and
2. Custom Built 2005 - Windows corrupted.
Security compromised. Protection bypassed.
This is what the second one wrote: (The
1. HP 6830 64 MB RM. Virus activity noted. Cleaned
out registry. Removed AVG antivirus. Adware found. Unable to install anti-virus
due to lack of space.
2. Generic PC (2005 built) - Firewall intrusion
detected allow netbios connectivity. Hacker activity detected. Level of
hacking: 8 (1-10). Security logs were cleared to remove any traces of suspicious
activity. UPREG.EXE found. installed McAfee antivirus. Installed Webroot
The second specialist kept insisting there was some way this determined
hacker keeps getting in my computer every time I'm online, so he installed
Spysweeper to figure out how. Said program located two Trojans, both from
New York Daily News authored content that was on my computer, giving the hacker
As I mentioned in last month's Column, this is the same newspaper I reported
to the FBI back in April of this year,
"as having printed a criminally obtained advance copy of
my forthcoming book "50 Reasons Why Hollywood Stinks" changing it up a bit, printing
it in the paper as a long article and attributing it to Madonna.
They obtained an
advance copy of the book was procured via breaking an entry and stealing a copy of it that
was on CD ROM, straight off my desk. Then a week and a half after I called the
Police and reported the burglary, filing a report when I'd noticed the discs were gone, the
contents of one of the discs containing the unpublished book, mysteriously
surfaced in that
New York newspaper, attributed to none other than sick in the head Madonna."
What started with Madonna stealing released work from this web site in plain
view of so many of you, some of whom wrote me and asked me if I didn't notice
she was ripping my work off, grew to her hiring a hacker to hack my computers,
when I started mentioning on the web site that I've been working on all these
They hacked the computer numerous times and copied my already copyrighted
catalog of over 8,000 songs, several dozen movie scripts, a dozen book manuscripts, music
video treatments and picture treatments, and she criminally began using them for
her own projects and fencing off some items she didn't have the ability to fully use,
(some of the) scripts, to her associates who all have clear financial ties to her.
All my copyrights predate the rip offs that are mostly verbatim thefts, while
others have slight changes in vain attempts to hide the thefts - as she has done
to over 30 other artists throughout her shameful, fraudulent career (for article
about her many thefts
There is precedent for Madonna committing gross acts of invasion of privacy
prior to this, as she has been sued for it three times before. In one case, a
couple in Miami whose privacy she foully invaded, that sick old pervert, accused
her of bribing the district attorney to not bring charges to the case. In light
of what I have seen in terms of corrupt out of that Federal Court in Miami, what
he said is noteworthy and is included in the film and book about all this, that will be realized internationally next year.
When I stopped putting new works on the computers that went on line, that's
when the constant break-ins started late last year, where they stole copyrighted
CD ROMs from my home studio with items on the discs later surfacing in the New
York Daily News, among other places, all attributed to Madonna.
Defamer Lloyd Grove
Coincidentally, two weeks after last month's Column where I made that
announcement, Lloyd Grove who defamed me in the article arranged by Madonna and
co. was let go from the New York Daily News. I'm still going to sue them and him
though, as you don't invade my privacy and defame me without some sort of
public, legal ramifications, domestic and or international. Not gonna fly with
I'm legally going after Roger Friedman as well, who also got in on the act,
as sponsored by Madonna and co. I'm just waiting for the investigations I'm
sponsoring to be complete. You know, the legal kind of investigation where you
don't hack people's computers, hack their web sites, hack their email accounts,
commit identity theft, wiretap their phones, steal their mail and pay people to
harass, assault and stalk them in public, under the guise of being a PI, like
Madonna's lawyer's man Anthony Pellicano did or like what transpired in the
shameful HP case.
HP CEO Patricia Dunn [
New York Times, Matt Richtel and Damon Darlin]
My dad saw that case on the news and said it reminded him of what happened to
me (I went through and reported to the FBI several of the things mentioned in
that case before it happened). When I saw it on the news I thought the same
thing. You know what's ironic, the PI behind that scandal is also
name Anthony (not Pellicano, another Anthony).
Clearly the PI's to the rich and famous are actively breaking scores of
domestic and international laws in illegal surveillance campaigns commissioned
by their clients with money to break the law. And make no mistake, these clients
are fully aware of the crimes being committed to get them this information, but
they don't care, because with Robert Mueller running the FBI, the likelihood of
them going to jail for these serious human rights and financial crimes is next
Don't Hold Your Breath
As I mentioned in a previous column, the British police investigator I spoke
to about the case told me "Don't hold your breath" regarding the FBI doing its
job. I should have finished the whole statement in writing all he said, but I
didn't want to post too much of it. He said unless there is a large amount of
financial loss, they (The FBI) don't pursue the cases, therefore I shouldn't
hold my breath.
Sorry to say, he was right, as a month later, the second FBI agent that
interviewed me, the lady named Mary basically told me the same thing when I
asked what the procedure is in these cases. She said "we investigate it and turn
it over to" the state attorney. She said the criteria for them (the state
attorney's office, which is like the DOJ) taking the case and prosecuting it, is
there being great financial loss.
People take note, just because crimes are committed against you, doesn't mean
justice will be pursued.
Web Site Email Address Spoofed
Said commission hacker, made up (spoofed), an email address for this site and
during the first week of October of this month, sent out hundreds of spam emails
in the web site's name, saying who knows what. My hosting company and Spam
Arrest confirmed someone created the fake email account and was sending spam
with it from elsewhere, setting it up to look like it was from me, when it was
Before it was someone registering at MySpace under my full name and hosting a
web site pretending to be me, writing who knows what on there. MySpace had to
delete the fake account and give me my name back.
Before that it was a commissioned hacker, hacking the web site and removing
the links to the Madonna article I wrote that listed all the works she's stolen from so
As I wrote before, the FBI sent me a letter in July about my personal
identifying information/data being compromised via computer in a crime and that
they are investigating it, but amazingly they've said nothing about the stolen
copyrights that mafioso witch criminally procured a copy of and is using.
Madonna & Guy Ritchie Steal Another Of My Films And Will Be Headed To My
Homeland Jamaica To Shoot It
There's an unfinished song I copyrighted years ago as apart of my catalog of
thousands of songs I have written, titled "Rude Boy." I also copyrighted a
script that is apart of a trilogy about a federal agent, the Miami drug trade
and the Jamaican drug trade. It was inspired by me being Jamaican and raised in
Miami and reading about and hearing about what was and is happening.
My father has even sat in on cases and is a respected Justice of the Peace in
Jamaica, which is a British magistrate. My father is even mentioned in a book by
a well known drug dealer, who is currently incarcerated in New York, with him
citing my dad when he worked for charity and was a mentor, as the only person
who tried to keep him on the straight and narrow.
I authored a completely original script, creating fictional characters and
story lines, in attempt to keep people on the straight and narrow as well.
This script was first copyrighted in 2001, with updates in 2002 and 2003. I
even bought the internet name I came up with for the film a few years ago.
Now in 2006, Madonna and her husband Guy Ritchie have ripped off the script I
have owned for years, that they criminally procured via the commissioned hacking
of my computers (as mentioned above) and changed the name to the song/title I
wrote years ago "Rude Boy," which is a Jamaican term for a bad boy or a
Ask any Jamaican and they will tell you "Rude Boy" is a Jamaican phrase
associated with the country's slang. Only Madonna and her husband are
illiterately spelling it "Rude Buay" instead of "Rue Boy" crassly imitating how
it is pronounced in Jamaican patois. Guy Ritchie is slated to direct - yes,
which means it will be a stinker, cinematic garbage and flop.
From Internet Movie Database:
However, that dirty judge in Miami, Marcia Cooke, you know, the one cutting
down terror suspect Jose Padilla's charges like she has Nelson Mandela in
custody and not a man with Al Qaeda links, who even opened fire in traffic at a
busy South Florida stop light (which is not normal for here), has empowered
Madonna and co. via her corrupt decision in throwing out my copyright
infringement case without even reading it, as the sign in sheets embarrassingly
show, to do this foolishness in Jamaica, which will no doubt turn out badly.
You know what the worst thing about this latest theft is, innocent Jamaican
people could end up getting hurt or killed in crossfire because of these idiots,
Madonna and co, arrogantly deciding they are going to a.) steal a script from a
Jamaican and b.) go out to Jamaica to make a film about the Jamaican drug
trade/gangs, who will not bat an eyelash in opening fire over that mess - an
outsider, making a film about them, a film that they stole from a Jamaican.
Jamaican gangs aren't exactly known for being polite. Last year, the Jamaican
government even ended up asking Britain for assistance in getting the crime
problem with said drug gangs under control, because natives did not want to
testify against them, and understandably so, for fear of being killed for saying
anything about them.
But here comes this stupid, instigating, thieving witch and her dumb panty
waist husband with the I'm-going-to-steal-a-script and go out to the island from
which the person hails that I stole it from and shoot a film about the dangerous
drug gangs and drug trade out there.
What's next, you gonna steal some music and writings from Shakira, then go
to Columbia and shoot a film about the cartels.
Madonna is the textbook definition of a vagrant troublemaker. Plain and
simple. Absolutely no morals, no decency, no character and no class. Money
grubbing, corrupt and dirty. I would love to know what went on in her household
growing up that turned out such a horrible human being.
Clearly the scandal and shame she created in Africa with the illegal adoption
Security Company Calling My Home And Hanging Up
Now, we've got a music industry security company, with a bully name calling
my unlisted home number, listening, then hanging up, as a form of harassment. My
numbers are unlisted, we just moved, only had it for a few months, but this
music industry security company is calling here, listening then hanging up.
Please tell me how that's appropriate, ethical or legal?
Based on what the caller ID listed, it's Strong Arm Security. I took a snap
shot of it and paid an investigative information company for the basic phone
registration info for the number, which is registered to Strong Arm Security.
When I looked them up online, they specialize in armed and unarmed security,
investigations and risk management, catering to the music industry and famous
people, and are apart of a gun club.
Once again, please tell me, how their conduct in calling here, listening,
then hanging up, upsetting my mother, is
appropriate, ethical or legal?
My parents are annoyed with this craziness and it's all being sponsored by
the same lunatic. They both said the same thing, every week it's something else
that she's paying people to do harassing me and they are tired of it.
All this stuff that's happened, from the commissioned hackings to steal
the copyrights right down to the stalker phone calls, can be traced back to her
or an affiliate of hers, via IRS records, legal records, financial records and
But because the head of the FBI broke his oath of office to cover for the
crimes she's been committing and that dirty judge threw out the copyright
infringement case (as they do with 99% of the copyright infringement cases in
the country brought by citizens against big corporations), this mess is being
allowed to continue, by the people overseen by Congress, supposedly to maintain
law and order and bring justice. Right.
Maybe international oversight is what is needed.
A Telling Deletion On IMDB
Remember a few months ago I wrote about script Madonna fenced to her partners
called "Valentines Day" which ripped off my script "Valentine's Day In New York"
copyrighted years prior to the thefts Madonna's been doing, through the
illegally procured copies of my catalog of works she illegally commissioned,
which I asked you to boycott when it comes out at a future date.
After the Material Girls boycott was successful and that film bombed,
"Valentine's Day" was mysteriously removed from Madonna's thieving associate's
resume, Katherine Fugate. It was on her IMDB page as a writer (which was fraud,
as she did not write it), but now it has been yanked from forthcoming theatrical
release by Warner Bros, Madonna's label, and switched to a lesser release on TV.
Quite telling indeed.
I'll keep you abreast of what's happening with that one.
The White Van
In 2004 I bought a used white van to haul music and video equipment. In 2005,
I wrote the van into one of my copyrighted scripts. The script notes stated that
the van was to be done over (like on Pimp My Ride) and used in the movie as a
surveillance van to watch criminals, with agents going into the van at different
times. This script is one that was also on the hacked computers, as mentioned
above, regarding how Madonna and co. illegally accessed and copied my unreleased
copyrights and started using them.
Months later in late 2005, Madonna puts out a story and a TV show segment
about a white van she bought and had fixed up to use in her music video "Sorry"
that goes around town watching people then pulling them in the van.
In my script, I never specified the van was white (but the van is white and
the South Florida vehicle title lists the color as white). How did they know it
was white to rip off the idea in full, if they didn't commission a surveillance
campaign of me and saw it in the driveway.
You know, that and the other crazy stuff like the 5 break-ins in a short
space of time to steal copyrighted CD ROMs...and my neighbors seeing a mysterious
white stretch limo circling the block and returning to sit in front of my house
twice for minutes at a time to the point they called my mother to inquire what
was going on.
Mueller's Inexcusable Conduct
As I wrote in the
June 2006 Column,
Mueller was sent a formal complaint about this case, along with a copy of the
lawsuit in September 2005, registered mail, with post office confirmation that
they signed for it, but he never responded.
Furthermore, he did nothing to stop
the crimes being committed in the case, which in tandem with that judge's
corrupt decision in the case, that's now reached the Supreme Court phase,
created the optimal environment for the crimes to get worse and worse, which is
a violation of their oaths of office and a Congressional bill that has been
proposed regarding FBI Negligence (Bulger case).
Most of you have undoubtedly read about the Mark Foley Congressional Scandal,
where said politician was having cyber sex with underage Congressional male
C.R.E.W. out of Washington D.C., reported this to Mueller in July,
sending him the inappropriate emails as proof of misconduct, one month after I
warned in this Column that this man is criminally negligent and his philosophy
in running the FBI is "shoot the messenger" bringing the bad news.
Wouldn't you know, he sat on those emails C.R.E.W. presented him with as
evidence against the famous politician and let kids in Congress continue to get
sexually harassed by a sexual predator.
It wasn't until C.R.E.W. went public with the story this month and pointed
the finger at Mueller for sitting on it, then lying to cover it up when the
story broke, that an "investigation" was put in motion by Mueller. However,
first he tried to say the emails were fake, also known as a cover up.
As you know, Foley has since resigned and fessed up to misconduct.
In light of this, how does that make Mueller's conduct look. Another piece of
the puzzle regarding this man, who is inexplicably in charge of the FBI.
My family and I wondered how he could ignore my formal complaint with Madonna
committing such serious misconduct and a whole year later, allow her to continue
commissioning this thoroughly reprehensible misconduct and breaking the law. As
this latest scandal shows, it's just his way.
You report a famous entertainer or famous politician, he will investigate
you, the victim, before the criminals.
Crew sent him the emails and a complaint in July and he sat on it trying to
protect a sexual predator that was preying on kids in Congress. That’s all I
needed to know about you. Good people don’t do things like that. Animals do.
This should not have been a political issue. Shame on the Democrats who knew
and were waiting to use it as political ammunition and shame on the Republicans
who knew and didn't stop it.
It should not have been a partisan issue. It should have been a protect the
Sexual predators breed more sexual predators via their young victims that
often turn around and do the same things to innocent kids when they get older.
Foley has said a priest molested him. Then when he got older turned to sexually
harassing teenage boys.
That’s another thing, the Catholic Church needs to do a round up, with
extensive interviews, and flush out every last pedophile. Turn them in. This
cannot be made to continue.
But what was Fuhrer Mueller’s (that rhymes) approach to this - cover it up
and let the kids take one for the team because a famous member of Congress was
He’s starting to make Hoover look like Mother Teresa (hey, the latter two did
both wear dresses - sometimes the most unlikely people have things in common).
How would he like it if an inmate started
emailing and sending him sexually predatory emails. You know, if that
Congressional bill about FBI negligence actually happens and Mueller goes to
prison for all his crimes against the Constitution and betrayals of the American
people via his cover-ups and lies:
Toodles, I’m Lady Buck, inmate number 21345. I
saw you in the prison yard today exercising and the way the sun hit your face
really set off your salt and pepper hair, which totally complimented your black
and white stripe prison issue jumpsuit. You were totally matching. I like a man
who can coordinate.
I also saw you in the library last week and
thought, boy, he must work out. Look at his bicep curl as he reads a copy of
“Running The FBI For Dummies.”
I like you, tell me if you like me too. Check yes
or no. Write back soon.
Did you dream about me last night?
OK, that was wrong (Aisha quietly laughing) but you get my point. To those of
you who read the Foley emails, and if you didn’t, I don’t recommend you do,
these kids were subjected to some very inappropriate cyber sex that is illegal.
If it were him he would not like it. But it’s okay that it happens to the
kids because the perpetrator is famous and it would breed a big scandal if the
public found out the truth.
But let a normal taxpaying American post something online remotely dissenting
and he will have a parabolic mic on you, scan your bank account, wiretap your
line, read your emails, investigate your dog fluffy and hang you upside down in
the town square quicker than you can say Fuhrer. Politician tries to fiddle with
the kids, he lets it slide.
Right. There’s a problem there.
After Mueller leaves the FBI, what kind of legacy is it going to have. He has
tarnished the agency’s name and its still happening. All these scandals and
revelations about him…that keep coming out. From articles about the computer
system to lying about 9/11 to trying to cover up the Foley scandal.
Someone like that should not be running the FBI. How many other crimes has he
covered up that people don’t know about?
And this is who is in charge of the country’s security and law enforcement -
Forest Gump. It’s pretty messed up, Mueller, when the public has trouble
distinguishing you from the criminals.
Innocent people could die because of his lackadaisical attitude in pursuing
justice - not just here, but in other countries as well.
He actually believes, as was reported by the BBC, that you don’t need
experience in Muslim, Arab or Islam studies to fight the war on terror. He went
on record saying that.
Is he insane. How are you going to fight an enemy you barely know or
understand? You just gonna blow up people, civilians be damned, until you get to
the right people you’re looking for. Because that’s not gonna work.
As for the Muslims we do have on our side…he reportedly retaliated against
the highest-ranking one in the FBI, denying him promotion. You know, if you are
gonna treat every Muslim like an enemy, they just may give you your wish - and
many innocent people may not live to regret it.
You need to learn integrity, diplomacy, intelligence gathering and take some
racial tolerance classes.
Supreme Court Filing
I will post the Supreme Court filing on the
lawsuit page in a few days, along with other case files.
10-1-06 Madonna Steals More
Copyrights, Computer Specialists Certify My Computers
Are Being Hacked
BOYCOTT - 10-1-06 Madonna has once again violated another one
of my unreleased copyrights she illegally obtained a copy of, with the
b-side to her new single "Jump" being released this month. I am asking
you to boycott this CD single. She added the rip off song "History" at
the last minute to rip off a forthcoming song from my copyrights. They
released a 3 minute clip of it today and it rips off another one of my
And if this does not desist, I'm going to add a weekly feature to the
web site where I post every forthcoming Warner Bros release and ask the
public to boycott each one if that's what it takes to make Edgar
Bronfman and Madonna stop this criminal theft, while the useless,
cowardly head of the FBI, Robert Mueller, sits on his butt and doesn't
do his job. No wonder you can't catch Osama, just useless.
Computer Specialists Certify My Computers Are
There are new developments and damning evidence in the case that I will post
it next month. But for now:
The two unrelated computer security companies, one based in Florida and the other New York with
offices all over the country, both specializing in computer data analysis and
intrusion detection, were called out to my house by me on separate occasions and concluded the same thing,
my computers are being
severely hacked. This confirms what I alleged in my
lawsuit against Madonna which also mentions that sick Kabbalah cult of
hers, who have both been sued on different occasions by different people for
disturbing cases of invasion of privacy and copyright theft.
Each computer specialist wrote on separate occasions last month, neither being told of the
case or the other’s
diagnosis of my computers, that my
computers have unquestionably been “hacked” – one rating the hacks as “severe”
and the other as “critical.”
Ironically, on the day one of the companies was called out to look at the
system via a previously arranged field visit, the computer was hacked and the
computer company security specialist got to witness the tail end of the hack, as Madonna’s
commissioned hacker damaged the computer’s software to illegally get in the
computer again for his daily hack and copy, then erased his trail – but not well enough, therefore it was
The hack/incident has been extracted along with internal computer picture snapshots, with
multiple copies stored for future use. I will post their reports about the
computers, and other stunning evidence next month.
hacking continues. There was one so bad this week that
Microsoft gave me the FBI's information and said I should report it to them
because this is "constant invasion of privacy." Microsoft helped me correct the
problem. However, with the sick level of determination this commission hacker is
showing , it is only a matter of time before it happens again.
Trojan From New York Newspaper Found On My Computer
One of the computer security specialists installed a software program on my
computer to search for Trojans that were giving the hacker continued, daily,
full-scale access to my computer, creating errors in the software when it went online, then transmitting the
contents to themselves and using it as I alleged she did in the lawsuit.
Said program found two Trojans, both from a well known New York newspaper.
Ironically it is the very newspaper that I sent a formal complaint to the FBI
about back in April of this year, as having printed a criminally obtained
advance copy of my forthcoming book "50 Reasons Hollywood Stinks" changing it up
a bit, printing it in the paper as a long article and attributing it to Madonna.
As I wrote in the Column previously, the
advance copy of the book was obtained via breaking an entry and stealing a copy of it that
was on CD ROM, straight off my desk. Then a week and a half after I called the
Police and reported the burglary, filing a report when I'd noticed the discs were gone, the
contents of one of the discs containing the unpublished book, mysteriously
surfaced in that
New York newspaper, attributed to none other than sick in the head Madonna.
They are also one of the two newspaper that defamed and libeled me in October
of 2005, the subject of another forthcoming lawsuit, in an attempt to discredit
me and the case (because what Madonna has done and continues to do is very sick
and criminal) via a planted article by Madonna and her ornery publicist Liz
It's the same newspaper with the idiot gossip journalist that emailed
me after hours to ask about the case, after the paper had already gone to print
that evening, to be published the next day. Amazingly he managed to get a quote
from Madonna's cantankerous publicist, though, which defamed me and
lied about Madonna’s criminal conduct.
He wasn't interested in balanced reporting, as much as his pathetic paper
with the circulation of a 100 year old likes to claim. He did not include any form of a quote
from me as to my side of the story, also known as the truth, as previous and new
evidence being uncovered each month is showing more and more that that sick
woman did all this stuff she's being accused of and stupidly still has not
He did that deliberately to give the appearance of being fair via the email,
not realizing the email he sent me inquiring about the case contained the time
he sent it out, which clearly showed it was after they had gone to print.
Therefore, they had no intention of getting my side of the story, being fair or
balanced, they wanted to defame and discredit me by any means necessary, in a
piece undoubtedly sponsored by the media obsessed Madonna, whose career only
exists in weekly faxed and emailed, placed articles in publications, which is
What they did constituted several felonies in publishing that ripped off
version of my book that they illegally obtained.
This to me is the most amazing part. How absolutely dirty the entertainment
industry is and how many people have gotten involved in her sick conduct. That
says something very awful about you. Anyone who would get involved in that mess
or make excuses for her despicable, criminal conduct, is him or herself a rotten
human being. Full stop.
My father always taught me that truth and justice is more important than being
popular (or in this case bribed). Because at the end of the day, if you participate in or defend
reprehensible conduct, you yourself will be deemed a person of bad character and
a reprobate as well and history will record you as such.
But it is very clear, the questionable, cowardly head of the FBI, Robert Mueller, and his look the other way to serious crime
approach if it is committed by the rich and famous (albeit the thieving rich and
famous) to the case, is what is giving them the confidence and bold face
arrogance to continue in the
criminal hacking my computers to copy newer copyrights and engage in other criminal misconduct,
ONE WHOLE YEAR after his office
signed for the package containing the formal complaint and lawsuit about the
While the Miami office of the FBI accepted the case and said they are
"investigating it" (at least they did something, unlike their boss) they can't
risk going beyond publishing in their report what corrupt Robert Mueller tells
them they can or they will get into trouble with headquarters, be demoted or
lose their jobs for telling the truth.
When they found horrific misconduct on her part, and I know they did, because
if we found all this stuff that will be posted on the site soon, I know they
found some foul stuff, but aren't making it public.
I will post more of the damning evidence next month, but Mueller's handling
of this matter says one of two things about
a.) He is ineffective, doesn't know his head from his butt, and can't
investigate jack. Because if I, as a private citizen can't find all this stuff
and hire people who have further uncovered stuff, and he hasn't, what does that
say about him? Really, he would have to be the bumbling equivalent of the Pink
Panther mixed with Leslie Neilson's character in The Naked Gun. And this is the
man in charge of national security.
b.) He is sitting on or has destroyed evidence in the case pointing to
serious crimes being committed by Madonna and co, crimes that continue to this
day, prolonging this ordeal for me and my family and endangering us. Once again,
do take note, this is the man in charge of national security.
While I do think he is an idiot as mentioned in "a," it's definitely "b."
8-28-06 Material Girls And Paris's CD Flops, New Article
About Madonna's Many Thefts
For new article about Madonna's many
thefts, an updated, condensed one, please
Material Girls and Paris flops. Material Girls
made $4,600,000 on its opening weekend, which is a major bomb for a
widescreen release (it would be a bomb for certain indie films as well,
actually), debuting at #9 on the Box Office Charts.
Then sales plummeted in the second week
(as if the first week wasn't bad enough). Considering the film cost
$20,000,000 to make, plus millions more in release prints, marketing and
advertising, and that the theatres get roughly half of the $4,600,000
the film grossed, this movie is a total creative and financial failure.
They will not even...break even.
Preliminary reports from Hits Daily
Double show that Paris' debut CD (Warner - Madonna's labelmate) will
sell in the high 5 digits for the first week, which for a major label
release that they spent millions on, had to do a video re-shoot for,
bribe, um, hire journalists for reviews, make a zillion
pricey promo appearances worldwide, with that huge, costly advertising
push, is a big flop. They are not gonna make their money back off that
atrocity of a record.
To put Paris' numbers in perspective,
Christina Aguilera's CD released the week before, sold a moderate
320,000 copies in its first week, which her producer, Scott Storch,
dropped her in favor of working with Paris (how does one choose Paris
Hilton, who can't sing to save her life, over Christina Aguilera who can
sing very well).
Make it worse, Hits Daily Double Chart
estimates show Aguilera's CD is on course to sell more/place higher in
its second week than Paris' CD will in its debut week (ouch!). Looks
like somebody picked the wrong project to produce, which won't help his
as I wrote two months
Make matters worse, Paris' CD, a major
label release, totally bombed in the UK, selling 2,000 copies (double
Also, news reports indicate both Warner
Bros and Warner Music aren't having a good year, particularly the
former, who have hit a big sales slump, which I will write about in the
next Sound Off Column.
Not to mention, this month AOL, owned by
Warner Bros, trampled on the privacy of their customers in making public
over 600,000 customers' personal identify data and search queries. I
wrote in my lawsuit that they don't care about your privacy, as I was
speaking from experience - they allowed their artist Madonna and her
commissioned hacker full access to my computer when I was with AOL,
which is how they nabbed a copy of my unreleased copyrights and
illegally started using them, in addition to the released copyrights
many people had already heard that they started using as well.
Said hacker further committed identity
theft, trying to spend all the money in my account via my Visa Debit
Card that was on file with AOL to pay for my monthly internet fees, the
week I announced the pending release of my CD, to leave me and the CD
marooned with no funds to promote it and press up copies.
And anytime I wrote something about
Madonna stealing from me on the site, AOL would block me from getting
online for several days at a time so I couldn't write anything else on
the site about what she was doing. I have proof of all this.
In last month's
Column, I wrote about my
belief that Paris and the Kabbalah cult run by Madonna, being behind the
hack of Lindsay Lohan. This month, what I wrote previously was confirmed
in several news outlets in that Spoofcard terminated Paris' account for
In my lawsuit last year I accused
Madonna and the Kabbalah Center of invasion of privacy and hacking,
among other things, and what happened to Lohan fits in perfectly with
their standard mode of operation. They invade the privacy of their cult
members (Fiona Davis case in London illustrates that), people who have
something they want (copyrights, money ect) and those who publicly speak
out against them.
A Kabbalah Center memo secretly obtained
by Radar magazine last year, revealed the cults' practice and belief
that they must get copyrights by any means necessary. And they do, even
if it means felony hacking.
...All while Robert Mueller at the FBI
looks the other way to celebrities breaking the law, twiddling his
thumbs and trying to figure out where the on button is on his computer.
As Newsweek wrote on August 21st of this month in an article that basically sums up my
July columns about
Mueller, why hasn't he been fired yet.
In closing, thank you to all of you
worldwide who participated in the boycott again. It is much appreciated
and is a consolation in the face of what the Defendants have put me and
my family through. God bless.
The Lawsuit Appeal, Letter From The FBI and DOJ
The results of
the appeal in the lawsuit to the 11th Circuit Court of
Appeals came back early and it was "denied" no explanation given. I'm
not surprised, given the sheer level of corruption I have encountered in
the court system.
As I wrote two columns ago, the next step is the Supreme Court and
then international legal and social course of action. I will keep you
abreast of all the developments.
The book and movie regarding all this corruption and criminal
misconduct is coming along great. I'm writing it as it happens, in
detail. There was also something corrupt that transpired regarding my
old home and I'm including that in the book and movie as well. I think
it's appropriate and warranted to tell the full story to the world of
the despicable things that have transpired in this horrible human rights
violation case. You'll get to see for your self, firsthand what happened
(don't worry, Hollywood won't be able to block it).
Speaking of identity theft, which I
covered earlier in the previous segment of the Column regarding the
Letter From The FBI/DOJ
I received a letter from the FBI/DOJ a couple days ago. Identity
theft was one of my main complaints
in the lawsuit,
which I submitted banking records for, as I felt it was connected with
my copyrights being hacked, illegally copied and criminally used by
Madonna and co.
At the time I made the allegation when I filed the lawsuit on
September 31, 2005, the Pellicano Wiretap indictment had not come down
yet. It was unsealed in February 2006, 5 months after my lawsuit.
Therefore, I had no way of knowing this was being done to others as well
as apart of a larger scale of harassment by that same Hollywood set, who
also threatened, wiretapped and hacked numerous industry people via Bert
Field's private investigator Anthony Pellicano.
The letter states my name was, "Referred to the FBI's Victim
Assistance Program as being a possible victim of a federal crime. We
appreciate your assistance and cooperation while we are investigating
It goes on to ask that information be submitted to a FBI web site via
a user name and password provided in said letter and contains
information of programs available to help victims. Yesterday, I went to
the site and filled out the information the letter asked for.
In the mean time, I will continue to investigate it myself and hire
people to do so as well. I don't like how I was treated. Mueller and
Gonzales ignored that we were and are in danger when they received the
Post Office delivery confirmed complaint that included the lawsuit,
which empowered that sick slut to act up even more and criminally so, at
our expense - 4 more break-ins case files/evidence stolen and
copyrighted, private, unpublished computer discs stolen right off my
desk, with its content later appearing in print in the New York Daily
News attributed to Madonna. It has created a great air of distrust.
7-31-06 Please boycott Madonna's film company's
movie, starring Hilary Duff. It is one of the films ripped off
from my copyrighted catalog, a film script synopsis that was over five
years old when they stole it.
I penned and copyrighted a script titled "My Sister's
"Contemporary Girl" after my song of the
same name featured on this site, which Madonna and co. later ripped off and
renamed the script "Material Girl" after her song of the same name then
Their criminal copyright
infringing film Material Girls is a rip off of my script and the theme
of my song "Contemporary Girl" about modern female CEOs. It has nothing
to do with Madonna's song "Material Girl" about using men for their
money. My script was about two sisters fighting for control of a family
owned company, of which one was the CEO. That is the plot for
Material Girls the movie.
Proving once again Madonna belongs nowhere near a film
set in any capacity, whether it be acting, production or otherwise, the previews
of this film reeks. Pure fluff. Inane nonsense. They stole my 2001 script and tried to turn it
into 2004's Mean Girls 2.
Please boycott Paris Hilton's new
anyway, you're not missing anything, I've heard the clips)
where she ripped off items from my already copyrighted work
that she got from fellow Kabbalah cult member and the label they share,
As I wrote in last month's Column, both the
video and bass line for Paris' cruddy debut single "Stars Are Blind"
were stolen from my copyrighted catalog that Madonna and Warner Bros got
their dirty hands on a copy of.
Don't reward them for being
thieves that rip off hard working people who actually work to earn a
living - instead of stealing everyone else's and relying on money they
didn't earn like degenerates.
Please boycott both projects, which are released
this August. Thank you.
More thefts relating to the lawsuit. Defendants Madonna
and Warner Bros criminally ripped off a video treatment I copyrighted
two years ago that is apart of my copyrighted catalog and used it for
fellow Kabbalah cult member Paris Hilton's new, terribly bad video
"Stars Are Blind" that's being slammed all over the internet. The song
further rips off the bassline from my 2004 song "Heart Versus Mind
As a Jamaican I can attest, "Stars Are
Blind" by Paris Hilton is the worst reggae record ever. Reggae records
aren't supposed to be cloaked in so much vocal processing to hide the
fact that the
so called singer porn star can't sing,
rendering the voice output you hear on the record into the sound of a
robot singing. Bob Marley must be rolling in his grave.
What does a racist, stuck up, nasty witch
that goes around calling black people "dumb nig*ers" know about reggae?
It's also quite telling how people on the
net keep commenting how low budget the video is after she spent all that
money on the record, getting famous producers and costly vocal
processing - and there is a reason for that. I am an indie artist and
indie filmmaker, my work is low budget and stripped down. That's what
indie usually means.
My video treatment that was good with an
artistic quality to it, has been criminally stolen and turned into a
tacky, tasteless, piece of trash. Bloggers across the internet are
making fun of the video saying it looks tacky and cheap (along with jabs
like "you know Paris gave that tree (in the video) herpes").
The video is disgusting now, thanks to what
they've done. She looks like a porn star or a dog in heat, rhythmlesssly
writhing around on the beach.
They used all of my already copyrighted
video treatment DOWN TO THE COSTUME DESCRIPTION in the copyright (the
dress she's wearing - a dead giveaway that they ripped off the video) except the guitar scene, because as you know, Paris
Hilton can't sing, let alone play a guitar. She can't even walk and chew
gum at the same time.
You all know Paris, the horrible human
being that arrogantly referred to two black men as "dumb nig*ers" when
she thought no one was listening (however, unbeknownst to her someone
was filming her utter the slur), goes around sleeping with married men,
breaking up relationships, threatening innocent people that she'll put a
hit on them through shady friends of hers, smoking weed, doing cocaine
and of course, starring in porn films.
Look for additional litigation regarding
this shortly for Paris et al. In the mean time I am asking you to
boycott her CD that's being released by Warner Bros. I heard the
leaked tracks from it on a blog, which is where I saw the video
yesterday, (Oh No They Didn't), and the album sounds like garbage. Trust
me, you won't be missing anything.
It's funny, when Warner Bros took a hit
when the 4.7 million dollar pic of Angeline Jolie's baby was leaked on
to the blogs Gawker and Oh No They Didn't (the latter a site that I have
posted feedback from in the Sound Off Column over the last few months),
they got all self-righteous, complaining how horrified they are that
their copyrights are being violated and are gonna sue the blog - but
it's the same thing they keep doing to me.
While I had nothing to do with the leak, at
least Jolie and Pitt had already gotten the money for charity, so I
could care less about Warner Bros' losses.
Also, please continue to
boycott the movie "American Dreamz" which has flopped. It is one
of the films ripped off from my copyrights that are apart of the lawsuit
and please continue to boycott Madonna's flopped rip off CD
"Confessions On A Dance Floor." Those boycotts went well and I thank
you for that. It is some consolation in the face of the unlawful things
that have happened and amazingly continue to happen.
Appeals Brief -
Additionally, the lawsuit appeals brief is online, please
I will post the record
excerpts that go with the appeals brief later this month, containing the
lawsuit (which you've already read on line
addition to scanning and uploading Judge Marcia Cooke's ridiculous
rulings that are a must read. In it she explains her fact-less,
Constitution-less, lawless opinion of why celebrities couldn't have done
this and "why they can't defend themselves."
A "pop culture icon" and
multi-million dollar miscreant companies with disgraceful legal track
records, that she works for, with clear, indisputable evidence linking
her to the misconduct and each company, who also "bring her work to the
masses" because "they can't defend themselves" against me, one person, a girl, who
filed the lawsuit pro-se. If you say so.
5-2-06 - As I wrote about in the
April Sound Off Column,
there was a fifth burglary to my home, where copyrighted work compact
discs were stolen with newer scripts, synopses, book manuscripts and
music video scripts on them. As I wrote in the April Sound Off Column, a
week after I reported them missing to the police, items from the discs
appeared in the New York Daily News attributed to Madonna and two other
Well, yesterday something else surfaced
from the stolen work compact discs - a movie script that is now
criminally being used by Columbia Pictures and Will Smith, who I am
really disappointed in.
The synopsis for his 2007 film "Tonight, He
Comes" was announced yesterday and it is an exact rip off of one of the
copyrighted film script synopses that was on one of the stolen discs
criminally taken from my home. She criminally sold it to them.
Columbia Pictures’ parent company Sony is already a defendant in my case
Aisha v. Madonna, which is on
I will fax this to the FBI as well.
April Sound Off Column
where I wrote about the theft in detail:
1. "There have been errors in this case in
the Miami Federal court. One too many. Just like someone in the Court
amazingly misspelled the name “Madonna” in the computer system so that
anyone who searches for the case WON’T FIND IT. Good thing I put it on
It’s amazing, they managed to spell all the
other names right, including my difficult to spell name and others, but
spelled Madonna incorrectly in the title "Madoona."
Not to mention, the info online contradicts
information and templates prescribed by the Federal Rules Of Civil
3. My home was broken into again. This
makes the fifth break-in since this whole Madonna commissioned
harassment, invasion of privacy and intellectual property theft campaign
The latest break-in occurred on April 2,
2006. Work compact discs containing newer projects I have been working
on such as copyrighted book manuscripts, lyrics, film scripts and other
copyrighted works were stolen straight off my desk. I called the Police
and they sent an officer out.
Further searches of my discs have revealed
that other CD ROMs are missing as well and I know she is in criminal
possession of them, as a week after I reported them missing to the
Police, data from one of the CD ROMs showed up a week later in the form
of an article in the New York Daily News attributed to Madonna and
writers Joe Dziemianowicz and Rebbeca Louie.
They stole a pre-release copy of my book
"50 Reasons Why Hollywood Stinks" (that was on several CD ROMs in my
home office/recording studio) from my house and used it weeks before it
is due to be published, which constitutes at least 3 felonies.
They have illegally used items from my
book, altered others and attributed it all to Madonna and said writers
in the New York Daily News. Instead of "50 Reasons," they cut it down to
"5 Signs" and changed items to make it about Madonna when the book
wasn't about her. However, items from my unpublished book are in that
infringing article and got there in a very felonious manner.
The Kabbalah cult and Scientology cult are
known for doing this. There are documented legal cases that have been
made public where it was revealed that they stole advance copies of
books before they went to the publishers and criminally misappropriated
them in their favor, violating innocent writers rights and copyrights.
Each case involved breaking an entry.
The leader of Madonna’s cult, Phillip Berg
was sued for breaking into the home of a dead rabbi and stealing his
book manuscript, which he illegally published under his own name, taking
credit for something he did not author. The later filed lawsuit revealed
what he had done – breaking an entry, trespassing and criminal copyright
infringement. He lost the case.
There definitely will be litigation
regarding this, along with the other defamation of character/libel
lawsuits for the articles that lunatic placed in the Daily News with
Lloyd Grove and with Roger Friedman's Fox News column in trying to lie
about the sick things she's been doing.
I faxed the FBI about it including a copy
of the article from the New York Daily News.
2. Forthcoming Britney Spears rip off - I
wrote and copyrighted a song I wrote about my little sister called “My
Sister" over a year and a half ago and it is apart of my copyrighted
catalog of songs, scripts, videos, manuscripts ect - that the defendants
in the case gain illegal access to.
Lo and lo and behold, this month one of the
defendants in my lawsuit, Britney Spears, released a clip of a rip off
song from her forthcoming CD titled “For My Sister.” Yea that's a lot
different from my song called "My Sister" you crook (sarcasm).
So Madonna is still acting like a hoodlum
fencing stolen goods (my work) around Hollywood to the highest bidder,
in acts that are criminal breaches of U.S. and U.N. laws.
Look for this case to go international in
the near future and in a very ugly way."
4-28-06 - The case in on appeal
after questionably being closed by Judge Marcia Cooke, who wrote down
the intelligence insulting ruling that basically states "pop culture
icons" and "the companies who bring their entertainment to the masses"
don't break the law.
Thanks to all of you who boycotted the rip
off film "American Dreamz" that was stolen from my copyrighted work, as
last month's Sound
Off Column. The film spectacularly bombed at the box office
Keep checking back for more updates.
12-23-05 - 1. Thanks to all of
you who have been clicking the Google links and visiting the sponsored
sites. It is appreciated.
2. Filed 58 page
amended version of the lawsuit
has been added to the web site. The amended version was requested by the
Judge, Cecilia Altonaga, on December 9, 2005. On December 13, 2005, in a
written motion, I formally requested she recuse herself as presiding
judge in this case, due to a significant conflict of interest, among
On December 22, 2005 I checked the
Court's computers and it did reflect a new Judge had been assigned the
case, however, I have not received written confirmation of this yet,
therefore I cannot confirm it.
To read the amended version of the
lawsuit, which adds new Defendants, due to Madonna continuing to behave
as a criminal defacto publisher of my copyrighted catalog of works she
has absolutely no rights to, unlawfully procured a copy of and
criminally began using, please
My copyrighted catalog, that that grubby
criminal got her greedy hands on a copy of illegally and has been
criminally using, contains over 6,500 songs, 2 dozen scripts, 4 dozen
film synopsises, 11 book manuscripts, 4 dozen music video treatments and
3 dozen photo treatments. It is the largest privately owned and authored
intellectual property catalog in the world.
3. Every song on "Confessions on A Dance
Floor," released 6 weeks after I filed suit on September 30, 2005,
ripped off items from my released CD "Aisha" and criminally damningly,
from my private copyrighted catalog only available on my business
computers that were hacked and in the Library of Congress in Washington
D.C. Said catalog was copyrighted way before she infringed it. Dates of
authorship were also digitally secured via other time stamped digital
means and additionally through poor man's copyrights.
4. Another Madonna/Warner affiliate,
Paul Weitz (Sitcom "Off Center" and forthcoming movie "His Dark
Materials: The Golden Compass (2007)") has criminally used one of my
already copyrighted scripts titled "Presidential Dreams" (script
copyright 2002 and site registration www.presidentialdreams.com April
2002) to make his criminally infringing "American Dreamz"
(copyright 2005, 3 years after my script and web site registration) for
Universal Pictures and have been added to the lawsuit. I read a scene by
scene synopsis of the film a couple weeks ago, written by a critic who
saw it and immediately noticed the blaring infringements.
My 2002 copyrighted script “Presidential
Dreams” is a patriotic comedy/drama about the American
presidency, a singer and the Middle East, among other things
– all unique and distinct in one script, among other items they
willfully stole. Defendants Paul Weitz and Chris Weitz’s 2005 illegally
copyrighted rip off script “American Dreamz” is an unpatriotic
comedy/drama about the American presidency, a singer and the Middle East
– all once unique to my previously copyrighted works until the Weitz
brothers criminally ripped it off.
Details of this latest round of
infringements and the criminal aspect of it, will be discussed in the
next Sound Off Column.
5. Lawsuits for the Madonna/Liz
Rosenberg sponsored defamation/libel campaign in the New York Daily News
and in the ever wrong Roger Friedman Fox News Column, will be filed
shortly. When I file it, I will post it to the web site.
6. I'm now adding UNIVERSAL PICTURES
to the boycott for the above mentioned reasons:
BOYCOTT - The boycott is
going well. Thanks to all who are participating.
Boycott the following companies and
their products. When you see them on the shelves, leave them there.
Don't go see their movies and don't buy their music and related
Madonna (all Madonna products, especially
"Hung Up " and "Confessions on a Dance Floor")
Warner Bros Records
Warner Bros Films
Buena Vista Pictures
Walt Disney Pictures
Lions Gate Films
Calloway Arts and Entertainment
The Sun Newspaper UK
There was a problem with the site this week that I just
caught. The site clips that were online are the old ones,
not from the new CDs. Someone rolled back the updates I had
done on Saturday and rerouted the links to point to the old
albums clips, not the new ones. The new store page was also
knocked off line by a hacker. Someone is still sabotaging
this web site via hacking in the same style of hacking my
catalog was illegally accessed and used without permission.
Sorry for the inconvenience. To hear the new album clips go
www.aishamusic.com/store.htm Keep checking back for
10-20-05 - Forthcoming multi-million
dollar lawsuit against journalist Lloyd Grove and the New York Daily
news for the defamatory piece they ran today regarding the lawsuit
(among other things). Forthcoming suit and accompanying exhibits will be
posted online. Mr. Grove, why did you email me yesterday? It's a good
thing I didn't respond in time, missing your deadline to go to print
considering the type of journalist you are.
In said arranged article Madonna's
publicist Liz Rosenberg caught a case of amnesia and senility all at
once. Fancy that. I'm being insulted by a washed up publicist kissing a
washed up untalented lip syncing star's butt, who made her way to fame
by, as one African newspaper wrote yesterday "trampling anyone in her
path to fame and fortune." A publicist who cusses off rabbis (God have
mercy on your depraved soul, as it takes a really foul human being to
cuss off a rabbi and publicly so).
You referred to me as Misswhatshername in
said article. It's amazing, just like you lot pretended you didn't know
who Keith Sorrantino was - you know, the little 10 year old New York
boy Madonna was sued for choking and beating up for pestering her
for an autograph on "her day off" and his family sued the sense out of
her for it. Yes, that was very sane, rational behavior on her part
(not). Most people who do that end up institutionalized. It seems you
lot get amnesia as to who people are every time she does something
criminal that can land her in jail.
Liz, I know you're in your 70's, but are
you really senile already, luv. Did you not read my lawsuit that you lot
were served that you are named as a defendant in or have you forgotten
your own name as well. It's a good thing my web site stats don't have
amnesia because for months it's been clocking hits from you lot.
So who do we believe, an established
rabbi cusser who defends a child choker popstar or a detailed digital
site stats program used by tens of thousands of webmasters around the
world that says you lot know exactly who I am...hmmm! So much for your
credibility. And from the feedback I've gotten, the public doesn't
believe you lot. You've done this rubbish too many times now to too many
innocent people. So keep spinning until you're a tornado, Liz. I'll be
there to rain on your parade.
10-19-05 - Forthcoming multi-million dollar lawsuit against
journalist Roger Friedman, Fox News and News Corp, for Defamation of
Character, Libel, Negligence, Negligent Misrepresentation, Plagiarism
and Copyright Infringement. Mr. Friedman published a libelous article about me today
on Fox News' web site that defamed me and failed to mention numerous
facts about Madonna and this case, such as Madonna's established history
of copyright infringement and plagiarism (she's been sued for it 7 times
and publicly accused of it over 2 dozen times) and assault (it was
reported that she choked Dick Clarke's son Rac and 10 year old Keith
Sorrantino on separate occasions, the latter having sued her and she
quietly settled it). Nor did he mention that her lawyer Bert Fields is
being investigated by the FBI for wiretapping via his private
investigator. Nor did he mention reported victims of said wiretapping
are Sylvester Stallone, Gary Shandling, Diane Diamond and a fellow
journalist Anita Busch, to name a few. Nor did he put a link to the
lawsuit to let people "judge for themselves" as he said - as their
judgment is to be based on his acts of defamation and libel.
He slammed Beyonce, an African American
singer, and several black hip hop stars (like Nelly and Kanye West) this
week for not writing their music, but taking all the credit for it, yet
glowingly writes about Madonna, a white artist, who is the industry's
most established and frequent copyright infringing star (just look at
the court docket that's been stacked with cases against her for said
misconduct). A bit of a double standard there?
He also failed to inform his readers that one of
his employer's newspapers' The Sun Newspaper UK, is a Defendant in the
Madonna lawsuit that he mocked, questioning whether it was a prank (when
you get served my lawsuit against you, you can ask yourself if you've
"been punk'd" as you wrote in relation to Madonna). Have
you not heard of Pacer or actually calling a court to fact check or is
fact checking a new concept to you. Well, I think it's the latter.
When the call came in from your employers
News Corp for you to try to discredit me through your column, did you
bother to tell them you'd been plagiarizing my Sound Off Column for
months, you hypocrite? When I get through with you legally and verbally,
you'll wish you hadn't written that article, but had quit your job and
applied at the Enquirer, when they'd asked you to try to discredit me
when I'm telling the truth about what happened and have proof to back it
Mr. Friedman, I do read
your column and you yourself have nicked items from my Sound Off Column
VERBATIM just as your co-workers at the Sun did. You plagiarize this
page often and I have the copyrights, poor man's copyrights and burned
time stamped discs to prove when I wrote each article, then your later
released rip offs, Mr. Blair, oops I mean Mr. Friedman. Here's one of
your rip offs:
Sound Off Column - February 14, 2005, I
wrote about lip synching and pop stars - "Spears cannot sing and her
looks like a
poorly synced karate film."
Three weeks later on March 8, 2005 Roger
Friedman wrote on Fox News about pop stars and lip syncing as well: "She
was often so out of breath, while dancing and trying to add in a vocal
here and there, that sometimes the tracks were
playing without her moving her lips.
It was a little like those bad,
out-of-synch Japanese films
from the 1950s."
I've got several more comparisons just like
it that are now forthcoming case exhibits.
Not to mention thanks
to IP numbers, these things are traceable (I have saved 2 years worth of
site records). Look for the lawsuit and service thereof within a month.
The lawsuit and all the exhibits showing you plagiarizing my web site
will be posted on the site for all to read as well.
I can see why you defended that thief
Madonna. You are one as well. You know what they say, birds of a
Roger Friedman today proved that Fox News needs to change its slogan
from "Fair and Balanced" to "Unfair and Unbalanced." I will no longer watch
your network and advise people to do the same.
10-17-05 - Criminal complaint submitted to the Metropolitan
Police/Scotland Yard in London regarding Madonna, Victoria Newton and
The Sun Newspaper's misconduct.
10-15-05 - Lawsuit posted.