Home Diary Lyrics Store Musicography Sound Off Site Articles Press
News Photos Art Schedule Videography Consumer News Music Publishing Press Releases
Bio Interviews Poetry Extras Filmography Judiciary Report Tour Advertising
Info Articles Interact E-List Bookography Celluloid Street Team Management
Radio Podcast MySpace Contests Club Compendius Site Info Industry Lawsuit
Free Songs Submit YouTube Search Links Aisha Music Blog Contact Tech Support

Hi, welcome to the site. New content will be added on a regular basis. There are also affiliate sites I've authored and designed such as www.compendius.com  www.judiciaryreport.com  www.celluloidfilmreview.com  www.consumernewsreviews.com  and  www.soundoffcolumn.com which has a new design. Thank you for visiting the web site.

Aisha v. Madonna Lawsuit

Boycott Madonna’s Copyright Infringing New CD “HARD CANDY”

CASE BACKGROUND: My years old preexisting Copyrighted Catalog in the Library of Congress contains 10,000 songs, 300 movie scripts and short stories, 15 book manuscripts, 200 music video treatments, 500 photographs, 150 photo treatments, a perfume line and clothing line I authored over the course of many years, that's now unwittingly made me a target. Madonna, who's stolen from dozens of artists, unlawfully accessed my preexisting Copyrighted Catalog and started using it without permission, releasing and attributing numerous items from my Copyrighted Catalog to herself.

In infringing items from my Copyrighted Catalog to get her own projects made, Madonna like a common criminal, exposed it to writers, producers and executives she works with at Warner Bros and other labels and studios, who got caught when they visited the site then knowingly used the work illegally, when they should not have known who I am click here for site stats. Madonna began Passing It Around without permission, in a very old, contemptible, unsavory, unlawful industry practice known to the FBI (Sophia Stewart v. Warner Bros). The case has been sent to the FBI, who said they are investigating it (I was interviewed by two FBI agents) and the UN, whose web site states they take 1 year to review Human Rights Abuse cases.

Because I chose to legally fight back against Kabbalah cult member Madonna, commissioned criminal conduct emanating from the same source began against me, similar to now well known tactics often used by Hollywood cults Scientology and Kabbalah, who share the same lawyer (Bert Fields). I have been harassed, sent two death threats, my web sites hosted by Go Daddy have been illegally hacked and spammed with thousands of  hacker generated emails (10,000). My computers have been severely hacked with the contents copied (Copyrighted Catalog). My home has been broken into numerous times, which police reports verify, where CD-ROMs containing my unreleased copyrighted music, movie scripts and book manuscripts were stolen. On my way to court dates and legal appointments regarding this case, as recently as October of 2007, I was criminally threatened in public by menacing individuals employing Anthony Pellicano style harassment tactics, who mysteriously know the private details of my life and contents of my personal and business phone calls. Madonna is among Anthony Pellicano's clients, so are her lawyer Bert Fields and former manger of many years, Fred DeMann.

In October 2007, a former Jamaican Prime Minister found a copyright attorney to represent me. Said attorney and a partner in his international law firm have been working on the case, as it relates to Sony/BMG and Interscope, as I requested. The Madonna case and the other thefts that sprang from it will be pursued separately and internationally in other world forums by a human rights law firm.


LINKS: LawsuitAppeals Brief | The Dozens Of Artists Madonna Has Ripped Off | Plagiarism Article

Computer Specialists Certify Hackings Of My Computer | FBI/DOJ Letter About Computer/Identity Theft |

Robert Mueller (FBI) Delivery Confirmation Receipt Of My Formal Complaint | Filed Met Police Complaint |

Supreme Court Petition | Human Rights Abuse Complaint (UN) | Madonna's Hackers' Info new | FBI FOI Request Response | Congress | My Copyright Registrations Listed At The Library Of Congress

INFRINGEMENTS LINKS:  Beyonce (Jive/Sony/BMG) | Britney Spears (Jive/Sony/BMG) |  Nick Cannon (Jive/Sony/BMG) | Kelly Clarkson (Jive/Sony/BMG) | Carrie Underwood (Sony/BMG) / Mario (Sony/BMG) | Daughtry (Jive/Sony/BMG) | Gwen Stefani - Madonna's cousin (Interscope) | Madonna (Warner Bros) | Danja Madonna's producer | Princess Diaries 2 (from the makers of Madonna's rip off Material Girls movie) |

COMING SOON: international lawsuits & more comparative lists of artist infringements.


8-16-07 Supreme Court Decision

From the July 31, 2007 Sound Off Column

Two weeks ago I received a letter stating the Supreme Court denied the case. I'm not surprised. I realized the Supreme Court was corrupt when certain decisions they kept pushing out was condemned by the public, and denying the case of Lewis Perdue, who Dan Brown blatantly STOLE SEVERAL HUNDRED COPYRIGHTED ITEMS FROM to make the Da Vinci Code book. Perdue copyrighted and published his books 20 years before Dan Brown stole them.

The courts side with the money coming into the Treasury, not justice. Besides, the Supreme Court only takes cases they feel will get their faces in the paper. They are not following Rule 10.

If they can grant Anna Nicole Smith's case, where her abandoned husband expressly left her out of his billion dollar will, for how she married him then took off, with the Justices going against the man's wishes, to give her another shot at stealing a family's fortune in court that she did not earn nor was she entitled to, then in the next breath deny petitions from people on death row whose lives are at stake and are emphatically stating they have been wrongfully sentenced to death, it says they are corrupt. You're better off giving your money to charity than filing a case with them ($400 fee). 

Not only are the preparation requirements for filing unnecessarily stringent and insufferable (do you know how many printing companies I took my petition to with the Supreme Court's instructions, that kept asking me, "what is wrong with these people," "why do they want all that?" and "what does that mean," for requesting such a layout and set up).

From the double sided printing on irregular sized paper, to the expensive 65 pound card stock paper they require, to the particular binding and excessive amount of copies (40 for the Supreme Court, plus 3 for each defendant) they aren't paying attention to justice matters, requesting all that, then churning out corruption on top of it.

They have another agenda and a corrupt one (for further reference see the race based school initiative designed to level the playing field, that the Supreme Court shotdown a few weeks ago, which drew condemnation in Congress).

Justices Alito and Roberts, you know the one that fell 10 feet this week, hit his head, was foaming at the mouth, had a seizure and was hospitalized, abstained from my case, according to the letter I received from the Supreme Court.

But I do think he slipped and bumped his head metaphorically as well, as the popular phrase goes, as he is responsible for that corrupt court and that's a cowardly, spineless, wimpy cop out. It screams corruption. You've protected the criminals and it is duly reflected in my forthcoming book and will be as well in my film about the case.

I guess them abstaining is supposed to absolve them of guilt, in that a person has been abused, assaulted on the same street as a U.S. court house, criminally defrauded out of billions in Copyrights that were devalued by lawbreaking stars and Hollywood executives, with her privacy and that of her family vilely violated, all in relation to the same case (Anthony Pellicano style), in your metaphorical house, on your watch, but you willfully ignored it, so you're not responsible, though you are the head of the court. Right. God don't like ugly, as the phrase goes and people reap what they sow. 

Not to worry, the international lawsuits are going to begin soon. They will be handled by lawyers and run as long as they need to, in as many venues as they need to, to get this matter resolved. So this thing is truly just getting started. Updates of developments in the case will be posted to the web site.

The UN complaint will be posted first and shortly.

I've also finished the book Justice And Truth, which is about the case and everything's in it. It's 200 plus pages and lays bare what happened, in all its ugly detail, blow by blow, including the massive corruption that allowed and condoned these very serious crimes, that goes further than I have made public (the UN complaint will reveal some of said additional crimes shortly, then the book fully). It's a real eye opener and you will never look at the system the same again after reading it.  

Since the Supreme Court's corrupt conduct, Madonna and some of the defendants from the case, have interpreted it as free rein to steal more copyrights, which they did, but I am asking you to keep boycotting them. I will post the recently announced forthcoming infringements I've found shortly. 

Since the boycott began in 2005, the albums and films stolen and listed on here as such, have all flopped. Thanks to all who boycotted them. They have lost far more than they have gained through breaking the law at my expense. Stealing from my Copyrighted Catalog has been costing them money and their credibility, as attested by numerous items online about the case.  

Warner Music Group, the main offender that Madonna records for, has seen their stock price go from $25 a share to $12 a share and declining. Madonna's album flopped, Kelly Clarkson's album that has lyrics from my Copyrighted Catalog illegally strewn all over it flopped and she was forced to cancel her tour due to poor ticket sales, Hillary Duff's album flopped, Stefani's album did poorly, falling out of the charts and failing to yield a real hit, Beyonce's re-release CD/DVD with the infringing music videos and songs bombed and was then pulled, and Rihanna's album has flopped, as it has been out for months, run out of steam and has not even crossed gold when they were expecting double platinum, leaving Def Jam disappointed (airplay can be manipulated, as the payola scandal of 2006 revealed):

JAY Z'S UPSET OVER RIHANNA'S POOR ALBUM SALES

"[Def Jam] has already sent out emails and made phone calls to producers and writers looking for a new female act to sign - to restart what failed with Teairra Marie and Rihanna. Everyone over here is really disappointed in Rihannas lackluster album sales. Considering that umbrella has been number one for so long and received so much positive feedback from radio, we thought it would should have done much better than 160,000 first week." - MTO

post link


6-13-07 Copyright Office Fraud Follow Up

Photo courtesy of Holy Moly web site

Yes, again. This is a follow up to my article yesterday about another incident of Copyright Office Fraud. (Copyright Office Fraud" "Copyright Office Fraud Update" and "Copyright Office Commits Fraud Again"). 

Please read that article to get up to speed, if you haven’t already, regarding Madonna, who I sued, infringing copyrights of mine that temporarily and fraudulently lost US copyright protection under suspicious circumstances, that later had to be reinstated by Copyright Office supervisors. 

Yesterday, shortly after that post, I called Copyright Office supervisor Brenda Roseboro to inquire as to what their explanation was for this latest incident.  

She blamed it on the sorting machines at the Copyright Office, stating my money order probably got separated from my Copyright registration.  

She said she will “do a check for loose checks” and even if she doesn’t find it there, she will ask her boss to comp it, considering I have proof of payment and postage that is tracked, which I read to her over the phone.  

She apologized again and gave me another tracking number and told me to send the copyright submission back that was fraudulently returned to me claiming I didn’t send the $45.00 fee, when I did.  

That settles this incident for now, but there is a greater underlying issue in this case that cannot and will not be ignored.  

It gives the appearance that certain parties in Hollywood are trying to get some of my Copyrights thrown out and are making illegal attempts to thwart the dates of authorship through illegal connections, so when they later steal and infringe it after they illegally access and copy it, they can try to claim they registered it first, when they did not.  

As I wrote yesterday, the Copyright Office is not my only legally accepted source of protecting my works, so certain parties in Hollywood are in for a nasty shock.  

But in the mean time, Madonna and co., continue to disgrace and corrupt the judiciary and Congress to everyone, in a case that is being viewed by millions around the globe. 

It goes to show that money corrupts some people and only a low class low life with money would seek such sick means at any cost to steal what does not belong to them.

It has been duly recorded and is being duly watched. 

After an unprecedented 22 plus copyright infringement and fraud lawsuits against her from credible people all over the world, all telling the same story, who don’t even know each other, does Madonna really think people believe her anymore.  

Article found here

post link


6-12-07 Copyright Office Commits Fraud Again

A follow up on my June 4, 2007 Judiciary Report articles "Copyright Office Fraud" and its June 8, 2007 follow up "Copyright Office Fraud Update." Yesterday, I received a package in the mail from the Copyright Office postmarked June 3, 2007. In it was a copyright submission I sent in on March 30, 2007, fraudulently returned to me once again.

This time they are claiming I didn't send payment with a copyright titled AISHA WORK 28, which is an error I have never made in over 15 years of copyrighting, when I did send the full payment of $45.00 via postal order number: 10719116752 via tracked mail no: 03061070000141804786 in that March 30, 2007 package. All documents pertaining to this and the other two incidents will be posted on the site shortly.

Isn't it great to know this type of fraud and lack of integrity exists within an offshoot of Congress. The contents of this copyright was properly preserved and registered with its authorship already established and protected in several ways.

Therefore, this latest attempt at fraud only provides more evidence and serves to illustrate the points I have been making, regarding the rampant dishonesty and lack of integrity present in this case, in certain parties trying to destroy some of my valuable copyrights, so money hungry parties in Hollywood can illegally use them in violation of domestic and international law.

This latest incident has been duly noted and added as additional evidence in my UN complaint and for the international lawsuits.

It doesn't look good on them, as this is the third time something of this fraudulent nature has happened, highlighting a very serious problem in Congress that copyright holders all over the world need to take note of.

post link


6-7-07 Info About Press Release

It appears the Madonna crazies commissioned hacker has been complaining about my latest press release to the sites that run it, due to the number of hits it's been getting.

They don't want people knowing about the case...or the continued misconduct they are engaging in that there is irrefutable proof of. Even her fans gave up defending her many months ago and stopped emailing me because with all the new evidence that kept coming out, they realized she's done something very wrong. They stopped emailing me, whining a long time ago.

The only one still emailing me defending Madonna under different names is the commissioned hacker from the legal case. 10 - 15 emails from the same person using different names, does not count as complaints, but as craziness (same IP address, range and writing style).

He's done what he is doing to the PR sites to my site before, sending a few dozen threatening, angry, crazy emails under different names (same IP). And that's when he isn't trying to hack my site offline so no one can read the case files.

Let the public decide for themselves based on the facts and evidence in the case, not reliant upon anyone's waning celebrity. There is such a thing as free speech in the world, where people are allowed to express via spoken and written word, the injustices that transpire against them. Why should you be the only one to air your side of the story, when you are the one breaking domestic and international privacy and copyright law. 

And considering Madonna and co. have a few dozen legal cases all over the world from different credible people, for invasion of privacy and willfully stealing copyrights and trademarks after other parties had authored and legally registered them, says there is a problem and that she is the liar. If you don't want people writing about your misconduct, don't commit it then. It's that simple. 

It is pretty sick and pathetic that anyone would seek to suppress and cover up such abhorrent conduct. It says they did something wrong and have something to hide. If you're arrogant enough to commit misconduct, be bad enough to own up to it. Stop being a coward.

The information is out there. People know about the case and what you've been doing. It's too late. Get over it. Credible, professional people from different walks of life have read the case evidence and slammed you for what you're doing. I am going to post a substantial amount of additional evidence shortly, since they continue to try to suppress the case.


6-5-07 Defendant Disney Criminally Steals Another Script From My Catalog

A new criminal copyright infringement of my work, has just been announced by Disney, who has been a defendant in the case, since 2005. It’s called “All About Adam” which is a criminally obtained rip off of one of my already copyrighted Biblical comedies. I am asking you to boycott this film when it comes out. Any changes to the title or anything with the project and I will let you know, so you can know which project it is to boycott. They are still criminally using items from the catalog in flagrant violation of domestic and United Nations laws.

Disney Films has been a visitor to this site on numerous occasions for years now well BEFORE and after the case was filed against them, meaning they’ve been targeting me for some time now and in violation of SEC rules. They have racked up thousands of hits to the site that I will post the data for shortly:

Disney nabs 'All About Adam'

Studio purchases Schoolcraft, Simons script
By MICHAEL FLEMING

Disney has made a preemptive six-figure purchase of "All About Adam," a spec script by Alan Schoolcraft and Brent Simons. Scott Rudin will produce the project.

Spec follows the biblical Adam as he trails Eve to modern-day Gotham after they have a lover's quarrel. Adam discovers Satan was behind the breakup.

Deal marks the second significant spec sale for the writers; DreamWorks Animation previously snatched up "Mastermind." That project has Ben Stiller attached to produce, with Cameron Hood and Kyle Jefferson to direct. They helmed the DreamWorks Animation 3-D short "First Flight."

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117966184.html?categoryid=13&cs=1

post link


6-4-07 Copyright Office Fraud

Here is an excerpt from my United Nations human rights abuse complaint, related to the legal case Aisha v. Madonna, that was delivered to the appropriate party to file. This excerpt is regarding copyright office fraud that I've encountered twice:

COPYRIGHT OFFICE FRAUD

"As Section 12 of this complaint illustrates, I am the owner of dozens of copyright certificates from the Library of Congress in Washington, DC.

While all my works are securely copyrighted, a copyright submission titled AISHA WORK 19, was returned to me, via fraud, by Copyright Office Supervisor Brenda Roseboro.

In a Copyright Office letter dated February 28, 2007, postmarked by the U.S. Mail service on Friday, March 2, 2007 and received by me on Monday, March 5, 2007, it stated I only sent in $30 for this particular copyright and that the rates were just raised that very month to $45.

In a letter dated May 7, 2007, Copyright Office Supervisor Brenda Roseboro, committed fraud, via writing that she sent me a letter on August 31, 2006, stating I had remitted the copyright registration fee accompanying AISHA WORK 19, $15 short and to send the additional funds in the amount of $15 within 60 days.

She did nothing of the sort. The letter she sent me flagging AISHA WORK 19 for being $15 short, due to the Copyright Office increasing fees that same month I sent in that registration for the copyright AISHA WORK 19, was DATED February 28, 2007, NOT August 31, 2006 as she claimed in her letter.

Furthermore, I remitted the additional $15 requested, within the allotted time, via a U.S. postal order, no 10720786544 and sent it via U.S. mail that is stamped and marked with a record of having been sent and on time.

Ms. Roseboro's deeds constitutes fraud of the highest order, as the Copyright AISHA WORK 19 is worth a significant amount of money.  

Prior to sending in the copyright registration AISHA WORK 19, I purchased ICANN internet names for the copyrighted songs and scripts in the project, as well as securing the copyright via other means.

AISHA WORK 19 is also embedded in other copyrights that were approved, unbeknownst to Ms. Roseboro. The works are thoroughly registered in multiple ways and protected under domestic and international law.

However, this was another blatant attempt at trying to get rid of one of my Copyrights, to pave the way for uncreative, lawbreaking parties in Hollywood to use it in violation of the U.S. Code and United Nations laws.

This misconduct transpired once before, via U.S. Copyright Office employee Robert Blakenburg, mentioned in the lawsuit Aisha v. Madonna, who told me over the phone, "You can't sue Warner Bros" which is Madonna's record label, without me even telling him I was suing them. He further fraudulently and menacingly told me items really "Aren't copyrightable and anyone is free to use your works." If that is the case, what is the purpose of having a Copyright Office.

Mr. Blakenburg fraudulently flagged one of my copyright registration submissions and did not send out the required Copyright Office letter stating what he had done. Copyright Office rules mandate any works flagged by a Copyright Office agent must be accompanied by a letter sent to the registrant notifying them of the work being flagged and giving them the standard 120 days to make corrections and or answer the questions the copyright agent had with their registration submission.

After the 120 days elapses without a response from the registrant, the copyright registration can be thrown out and the registrant loses all rights to their work.

Mr. Blakenburg, threw out that copyright registration without even sending the letter, which constitutes fraud under the U.S. Code, as it was a valuable copyright.

I had to complain to his supervisor to have the works reinstated. She apologized and reinstated the copyright.

It is disgraceful that the Library of Congress, which exists as apart of the U.S. Congress, would resort to such tactics to defraud a minority and an immigrant, because parties in Hollywood have designs on a valuable copyrighted work that does not belong to them.

However, tellingly, W-------- (name withheld from the internet until investigations are completed), mentioned previously in this complaint, who had placed harassing phone calls to my home, threateningly stated to me over the phone months prior to this incident regarding Ms. Roseboro, that the labels in the lawsuit, "Have people at the Copyright Office who backdate things for them." Months later, Ms. Roseboro did just that on a copyright that Madonna is currently infringing in association with her partners in Hollywood.

However, unbeknownst to her, the work was lawfully protected, registered and imbedded in other copyrights I own as well, all pre-dating her willful thefts and that of her associates. 

Such conduct does not belong in Congress, as it is not the principles the United States was founded upon."  

Story found here

post link


5-19-07 Press Release: Madonna Steals Song "Hey You" For Live Earth

Madonna Steals Song "Hey You" For Live Earth

Miami, Florida, May 19, 2007 - on May 3, 2007, Aisha released a free song titled “Thieves” via her web site www.aishamusic.com, about Madonna and the copyright infringement legal case Aisha v. Madonna, which was filed with the Supreme Court in April 2007 (case no. 06-1389). Press releases were issued that were carried on several press sites two weeks ago.

Two weeks later, on May 16, 2007, Madonna has mimicking released a free song titled “Hey You,” where she further unlawfully stole items from Aisha’s private, unreleased, Copyrighted Catalog, valued at billions due to its sheer voluminous content, which contains 9,000 songs, 300 movie scripts and short stories, 15 book manuscripts, 200 music video treatments, 500 photographs, 150 photo treatments, a perfume line and clothing line.

Additional litigation will be brought over the song “Hey You” by Madonna, which was illegally released through MSN.

Aisha stated, “I know my words when I see them and these items were copyrighted long ago before she infringed them this week. Once again, she has stolen copyrighted material that does not belong to her. She is unequivocally the most unoriginal artist in the history of music. How can one claim to be doing charity work, for which one has stolen that which is being contributed. Only a fraud would do that. Not to mention, the song sounds bad due to her singing. The hot air that is her thin, squeaky, wobbly voice will not help climate change.”

A formal complaint was filed with George W. Bush appointees Alberto Gonzales at the DOJ and FBI Director Robert Mueller in September of 2005, as copyright infringement is a crime the FBI investigates.

However, Mueller has shirked his duties once again, as he was publicly noted to have done in the Mark Foley congressional page scandal, where another famous figure was involved. The Inspector General excoriated the FBI for this conduct, under Robert Mueller.

Aisha stated, “Mueller’s criminal negligence in this case in allowing Madonna to continue to illegally use years old copyrights on a regular basis, speaks terribly of him and his abilities as chief law enforcement officer of the country. It stands to reason, if he can’t stop Madonna, how’s he going to stop Osama. They need to listen to Congress and the American people and step down for the sake of the country.”

Aisha was the first to break the story in her December 2006 internet based Sound Off Column about the FBI abusing the Patriot Act via improperly obtaining emails, bank statements and phone records of American and international citizens. Three months later, Aisha’s claims in her Column were confirmed when in March 2007 IOG Glenn Fine wrote of FBI abuses of the Patriot Act regarding emails, banks statements and phone records, resulting in a recent Senate inquiry.

The local Miami FBI, run by Jonathan Solomon, stated they are investigating the criminal copyright infringement and invasion of privacy case Aisha v. Madonna. However, this has not stopped Madonna and her associates from unlawfully continuing to pilfer the contents of Aisha’s preexisting, private, Copyrighted Catalog that was proven to have been procured by them via illegal means, in making an unauthorized copy of the master file, with additional items stolen from Aisha’s publicly viewed web site.

Aisha further stated, “An illegal copy of my Copyrighted Catalog was made and she continues to unlawfully use items from it, attributing them to herself and her associates in violation of U.S., British and United Nations laws. She has illegally passed around and sold items from my Copyrighted Catalog to other parties in the industry, who have been tied to her via business records and tax records, as well as stealing items for herself and her companies in violation of SEC laws, that govern each respective corporation.”

UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT

A United Nations human rights abuse complaint has been prepared and will be filed with the U.N. via an assigned international representative. Aisha’s human rights have been violated in respect to her copyrights, property ownership and privacy, which has been invaded in the same manner that other victims experienced in the Anthony Pellicano case.

Anthony Pellicano is Madonna’s lawyer’s now incarcerated private investigator. The contents of the human rights abuse report will be posted to the Internet shortly via Aisha’s web site.

COMPARATIVE LYRICAL CONTENT OF THE INFRINGEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE SONG “HEY YOU” BY MADONNA TO AISHA’S PREEXISTING COPYRIGHTS THAT ARE YEARS OLD:

Aisha: don’t give up
Madonna: don’t you give up

Aisha: Life isn’t so bad
Madonna: It’s not so bad

Aisha: A chance for you - give us a second chance
Madonna: There’s still the chance for us

Aisha: the courage to be yourself
Madonna: just be yourself

Aisha: poet and peacemaker
Madonna: poets and prophets

Aisha: Tell me why you act so shy
Madonna: Don’t be so shy

Aisha: There's a reason people have so much difficulty
Madonna: There’s reasons why it’s hard

Aisha: Make it together
Madonna: Keep it together

Aisha: we'll make it anyway
Madonna: we’ll make it alright

Aisha: But will you change, you’ve got to beat this thing
Madonna: You’ve got to change this time

Aisha: Remember this
Madonna: Remember this

Aisha: Is real, It’s more than something you feel
Madonna: None of it’s real including the way you feel

Aisha: Save your soul
Madonna: Save your soul

Aisha: little sister
Madonna: little sister

Aisha: Save your soul
Madonna: Save your soul

Aisha: little Brother
Madonna: little brother

Aisha: Save yourself the pain
Madonna: save yourself

Aisha: learn to love yourself
Madonna: first love yourself

Aisha: courage to love someone else
Madonna: then you can love someone else

Aisha: I can’t change everyone
Madonna: If you can change someone else

Aisha: save everyone else
Madonna: saved someone else

Aisha: it’s a choice you make
Madonna: You’ve got a choice

Aisha: everything makes sense
Madonna: it will make sense

Aisha: learn to love yourself
Madonna: first love yourself

Aisha stated, “Madonna is famous for taking other people’s songs, changing a line or two, then taking full writer’s credit and financial compensation for something she did not write. That’s called stealing and fraud. Thanks to her, we now have the unenviable task of monitoring all new releases, checking for people she illegally sold items from my Catalog to, in order to bring future lawsuits to get my work back.”

Madonna’s many copyright infringement, civil rights violations and breach of contract cases illustrate a pattern of misconduct that has spanned five countries:

1. Aisha v. Madonna (civil rights and copyright infringement)
2. Sorrentino v. Madonna (assault and battery on a 10 year old child)
3. Myers v. Madonna (civil rights violations)
4. Ronald J Myers v. Madonna (civil rights violations)
5. Barrier v. Madonna (civil rights violations)
6. Bourdin v. Madonna (copyright infringement)
7. Easy Street Records v. Madonna (copyright infringement)
8. Acquaviva v. Madonna (copyright infringement)
9. D’Onofrio v. Madonna (copyright infringement)
10. Iving L Williams v. Madonna (copyright infringement)
11. Eon Net LP v. Madonna (copyright /patent/trademark infringement)
12. Rich Kidd Music Publishing, Inc. v. Madonna (copyright infringement)
13. Winterland v. Madonna (copyright infringement)
14. Hobe Cie. LTD v. Madonna (trademark infringement)
15. Coppola v. Madonna (personal injury)
16. Rice v. Madonna (breach of contract)
17. Mclay v. Madonna (breach of contract)
18. Nike, Inc. v. Madonna (breach of contract)
19. Millennium Films v. Madonna (breach of contract)
20. Done and Dusted v. Madonna (breach of contract)

FULL LIST OF ALLEGED INFRINGEMENTS:

The following is a list of works from Aisha’s aforementioned Copyrighted Catalog that she formally alleged Madonna and her affiliates such as Warner Bros Pictures, Warner Bros Records, Warner Bros’ artists like Paris Hilton and Madonna's cousin, Gwen Stefani, among others Madonna does business with, have unlawfully used, in the ongoing infringements of her copyrights.

Defendants in the case who have already been sued in the 2005 Aisha v. Madonna lawsuit that was recently filed with the Supreme Court, continue to infringe more of Aisha’s works, such as Sony for Beyonce and Interscope for Gwen Stefani, who has stolen from Aisha’s Copyrighted Catalog two albums in a row now, reaping millions in illegal profit.

1. Princess Diaries 2 (2005)
2. Prince And Me 1 & 2 (2005)
3. Sam’s Lake (2005)
4. Gravedancers (2005)
5. Material Girls (2006)
6. Valentine’s Day (2006)
7. American Dreamz (2006)
8. Goal (2006)
9. My Sister’s Keeper (2006)
10. Blond Ambition (2007)
11. Rude Buay (2007) being used by Madonna’s husband Guy Ritchie (his fourth infringement lawsuit since he has been with her).
12. Tonight He Comes (2007)
13. “American Life” song by Madonna (2003)
14. “Orange County Girl” by Madonna’s cousin Gwen Stefani (2006)
15. “Confessions On A Dance Floor” CD by Madonna (2005)
16. A backdrop from Madonna's Re-invention world tour (2004)
17. A backdrop from Madonna's Confessions world tour (2006)
18. "Sorry" Music video by Madonna (2005)
19. “Stars Are Blind” music video by Madonna's fellow Kaballah Centre member and Warner Bros artist Paris Hilton (2006)
20. Madonna's fellow Kaballah Centre member Britney Spears’ “Streams Of Consciousness” column, ripped off my “Sound Off Column” - both bearing the same initials and written content that Spears plagiarized years after my Column was copyrighted, indexed and established online.
21. Items from my clothing line have been illegally used for Madonna's English Roses clothing line (2005)
22. Items from my clothing line are illegally being used for Madonna's H&M line (2007)
23. December 2006's "Beauty Buyble" by Judith Regan's Regan Books, who was behind Madonna's 1990's "Sex" book.
24. E’s 2007 “Boulevard Of Broken Dreams”
25. “Dandelions” by Madonna’s fellow Kabbalah Center member Nicole Richie
26. “Where Is Your Dignity” “Burned” and “Happy” by Hillary Duff, who starred in Madonna’s infringing film she stole from my Catalog, “Material Girls”
27. “Hollaback Girl” by Madonna’s cousin Gwen Stefani (2005)
28. “Worldwide Woman,” “Amor Gitmo” and “Welcome To Hollywood” by Beyonce Knowles (2007)
29. “Beautiful Liar,” “Suga Mama,” “Greenlight,” “Flaws and All” and “Still In Love” low budget music videos by Beyonce (2007)
30. “Umbrella” by Rihanna
31. “Can I Live” by Nick Cannon (2005)
32. My Super Ex-Girlfriend (2006)
33. “Never Again” by Kelly Clarkson (2007)
34. “Hey You” by Madonna (2007)
35. A verbatim theft of a specific cultural joke in “Charlie And The Chocolate Factory” (2005), stolen from Aisha’s 1998 copyrighted script “Presidential Dreams.” “Charlie And The Chocolate Factory” was produced by Brad Pitt’s Plan B Entertainment. Brad Pitt starred in Guy Ritchie’s box office bomb “Snatch” which was also the subject of a copyright infringement lawsuit. Since he has been with Madonna, different litigants have sued Guy Ritchie 4 separate times for copyright infringement, over the projects “Snatch” “Swag” “Lock Stock And Two Smoking Barrels” and in the legal case Aisha v. Madonna for pilfering items from Aisha’s catalog.


4-17-07 Radio Interview, Press Releases, Forthcoming Articles

I did a radio interview with mainstream Jamaican radio station ZIP-103 this afternoon. They were really nice and said Jamaica is behind me in the case. Hopefully we can get a copy of the interview to put on the web site. I’ve been doing interviews with Jamaican outlets, because my dad knows people there. And even in American born Sophia Stewart’s copyright infringement case against Warner Bros, among others, for stealing her copyrighted script and using it for the Matrix (my case is against Warner as well), according to published international reports, Warner Bros, the biggest media company in America, managed “a complete press blackout in America,” in attempts to hide the story and what’d they’d done in disgracefully ripping off the New York born Christian writer, Stewart, to the tune of billions.

Only the international media, for years have trumpeted her valid case that a questionable judge threw out of court (see a pattern yet - the fate of all copyright cases against Warner Bros - which warrants a federal probe).

In light of that, my family sought the international press to avoid the unbalanced Warner media manipulation that is not only unconstitutional and one-sided, but is also pathetic. If you do something, at least be man enough to own up to it – and Madonna is a dude.

Another international newspaper article should appear shortly regarding the case. As I said a week ago, my family and I are doing this to create awareness with the hopes of putting a stop to all the misconduct being committed against us that has gotten sicker. As I said before, some vile human rights abuses have been committed against us that have been tied to the defendants. We will discuss it shortly.

A press release was just released as well, and it’s available in Google News and on several sites:

http://www.prbuzz.com/supreme-court-petition-filed-against-madonna

http://www.fastpitchnetworking.com/pressrelease.cfm?PRID=8345

http://www.pressbox.co.uk/detailed/Entertainment/Supreme_Court_Petition_Filed

For Supreme Court petition click here

For press release also available on web site click here


4-8-07 Observer Article About The Case, New Infringements Found

There is an article available in the Observer newspaper today regarding the Madonna lawsuit I filed. My family and I decided to take to the press, as the misconduct against us has not desisted one iota and is growing increasingly worse. You can read it here:

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/lifestyle/html

Thanks to Pat and the Observer. The FBI has twice said they are investigating the case. But while the FBI are investigating, Madonna and co. are trying to use as much of my Copyrighted Catalog as possible which contains 9,000 songs, 300 movie scripts and short stories, a few hundred music video treatments, 15 book manuscripts and hundreds of photo treatments. The Catalog is worth billions and Madonna and her partners in Hollywood know this.

Just like her company Warner Bros made 2 BILLION off of stealing the script for THE MATRIX from a black Christian New Yorker, Sophia Stewart, who copyrighted it years before they stole it - with the FBI even finding her script was used to prepare the film and was present on set of THE MATRIX.

They have illegally made millions off of these verbatim rip off infringements of my copyrights that predate theirs by years, via illegally accessing my Copyrighted Catalog. Two separate computer companies confirmed the illegal computer intrusions. She has absolutely no conscience whatsoever and that Kaballah cult of hers has a long history of doing this very type of mischief, as does she.

Never mind her lawyer is at the center of an FBI probe for wiretapping, harassment and identity theft, three things I sued them for as well, before the FBI and DOJ ever went public with the case against Anthony Pellicano, the misconduct against us still continues unabated and has grown sicker  with each month that passes by. All of the details have not been made public yet.   

As for the illegal wiretapping, evidence and affidavits will be presented to support those claims.

Regarding the commissioned misconduct, every week it's something else, all of which has not been made public yet, but will be shortly.

My family and I are currently looking for international lawyers in Jamaica and London to pursue the case, due to the sheer corruption I have encountered, with misconduct that runs far deeper than any of you could imagine. We have not gone public with the whole story and all the evidence yet, but we will shortly. Like I said a few weeks ago, Hollywood is a sick place.

BEYONCE, JAY-Z AND RIHANNA

Just last week, I lost 4 more music videos and 3 songs from my Copyrighted Catalog to a 2005 defendant in the Madonna lawsuit, SONY, who illegally used it for Beyonce's re-release of her latest album B-Day. PLEASE BOYCOTT BEYONCE'S CD AND DVD.

When I complained in the Sound Off Column about Madonna and co’s conduct being racist/racism in exploiting blacks, shortly after they started to illegally spread and sell my copyrights to black artists who are on labels in the lawsuit I filed in 2005.

You are still exploiting blacks and immigrants on top of it to boot, who did you no harm. Criminally spreading my copyrights to blacks on white labels doesn’t change that and all the evidence points to Madonna and this case.

On January 31, 2007, I announced the release of my album and a few DVDs with several music videos and interviews to go with it.  

Two months after, Beyonce and her Destinys Child robbing father announced the very same, the re-release of her album accompanied by many music videos, which she’s never done before. Only the videos she filmed weren’t hers. They were stolen from my Copyrighted Catalog and her label SONY HAS BEEN A DEFENDANT IN THE LAWSUIT SINCE 2005.

They figured since the Florida judges in the case are so corrupt (for further reference see the Anna Nicole Smith case with Judge Korda and Seidlin), throwing out a case without reading it, that they can continue to steal as much as they like, because the court system is in their back pocket, a terrible pattern evident in their copyright cases. So much for truth and justice.

They are continuing to criminally use items from my Copyrights that they gained illegal access to via hacking, with computer specialists confirming my computers have been thoroughly hacked (CLICK HERE FOR REPORTS) and my home also sustained 5 burglaries where copyrighted computer discs were stolen, which was reported to the Miami Shores Police, who are waiting on the FBI (POLICE REPORTS POSTED SOON).  

SITE RECORDS ALSO TIE BEYONCE TO THIS WEB SITE AS A SITE READER.  

Beyonce's "Greenlight" video – is a direct rip off of the Contemporary Girl music video copyrighted in April 2001. To see my certificate, click here. My copyrighted 2001 music video treatment contained scenes, among others, of me playing a white guitar, resting my foot on the amp, playing a guitar keyboard, singing into a silver mic and sitting on the drums, against a white backdrop – all scenes present in Beyonce now 2007 “Greenlight” video 6 YEARS LATER.  

Beyonce doesn’t play the guitar or drums, I do, that’s why I wrote it into the video. She looked stupid, awkward and uncomfortable feigning playing the guitar and sitting on the drums.   

Fans keep complaining that Beyonce’s new videos are cheap and not what she usually does. It is for a reason, I am an indie artist, I can’t afford expensive videos right now. So some of what I have written for my Copyrighted Catalog contains low budget indie videos. That's my genre: indie music. I'm not on a major label. Therefore, there are no Beyonce/P-Diddy fireworks and explosion videos present right now. 

“Still in Love” “Flaws and All” and the “Beautiful Liar” videos are direct rip-offs of videos I copyrighted 3 YEARS AGO with the Library of Congress. (COPYRIGHT CERTIFICATES POSTED SHORTLY). 

2007's "Amor Gitmo" by Beonyce is a rip off of my 3 year old copyrighted song from 2004 titled “Amor Perdido” that was on the site for years as some of you will recall (LIBRARY OF CONGRESS COPYRIGHT CERTIFICATE #PAu2-938-924, December 23, 2004 - CERTIFICATE POSTED SHORTLY).  

Worldwide Woman is a rip off of my 2001 song Contemporary Girl (CLICK HERE FOR COPYRIGHT CERTIFICATE).   

Welcome to Hollywood is also a rip off of an unreleased old Copyrighted song from my Copyrighted Catalog. It predates their copyrights as well by years (COPYRIGHT CERTIFICATE POSTED SHORTLY).  

Beyonce’s boyfriend Jay-Z’s is also featured on the infringing "B-Day" re-release. One of my songs, Umbrella COPYRIGHTED YEARS AGO has been altered from being an inspirational song about God to being an inspirational song about a man and mysteriously surfaced on his now 2007 track, years later, with Rihanna, also titled Umbrella, with further rip offs from two other songs in my Copyrighted Catalog. My songs were all registered years before they have now been illegally accessed and used, which is a federal and international crime. Jay-Z has co-writer's credit for something that has been criminally stolen. PLEASE BOYCOTT RIHANNA'S SONG AND ALBUM.

Both Jay-Z and Beyonce have also been sued numerous times separately for stealing people’s songs and willfully robbing people in not paying them for work and services rendered. They have a long history of this misconduct as well, as evidenced by PACER's U.S. court system records.

3-17-07 New Infringement Found, Madonna's Father On The Site, Hidden Camera Found In Home, DNS Hack

Regarding the Madonna lawsuit, I found an additional infringement stolen from my Copyrighted Catalog and illegally used to the tee, to make the movie "My Super Ex-Girlfriend." Please boycott this DVD. The copyright certificates and side by side comparisons of all the thefts in the case will be posted to the site shortly.

MADONNA'S FATHER ON THE SITE - My web site statistics logged 116 visits from where Madonna's father works at General Motors, which my dad called "suspicious," under the circumstances. I agree.

BUGGING - With the help of a counter surveillance company in Texas, a hidden camera bug of the worst possible kind was found in my home, which is pretty sick. It's placement bears serious criminal implications of the most severe kind

It was something some of the defendants in the case said and did, that gave the game away and prompted the search for it. Hollywood truly is a sick place, full of human scum. My father in Jamaica is very angry at what has happened, as am I. He was so disgusted and upset when he found out about the latest invasion of privacy, that it sent his pressure up, two days in a row, sending him to the doctor, two mornings in a row.

This is how much what they are doing has affected our family, which is why I sound off about them the way I do in my Column. It's done nothing for my mother's blood pressure either. Neither did the 5 break-ins in a short space of time to steal CD-ROMs with offline and off computer newer copyrights on them and to put only God knows the full extent of what else, in our home, illegally.

How can any of this be right. The misconduct keeps escalating, even though the government via Robert Mueller of the FBI, who claims they are  investigating the case, and Alberto Gonzales of the DOJ, who were both formally notified of what these people have been doing to us in violation of federal, international and UN laws, with their office signing for the formal complaint click here.

However, God doesn't like ugly, as they are both under fire right now for abuses of the Patriot Act, the very abuses that I warned about regarding them in the Sound Off Column for months, starting last year. Many people are now calling for their resignation.

My family and I are working on something to publicly address what's been happening, as it has reached appalling levels worthy of U.N. condemnation for serious human rights abuses.

Items from my already copyrighted, forthcoming CDs and works listed on this site, have been mysteriously appearing on certain blogs, but attributed to Kaballah cult members like Madonna, Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan. I wrote a song about them last year, which is copyrighted and unreleased, to be released soon, yet saw items from it on three major blogs, which is illegal. It has been duly noted and is now apart of the investigation. Considering what I have experienced in this case and witnessed firsthand, so has the international community who is watching this case, it is a damning testament that they are not doing their jobs.

HACKING - They have also gotten a lot worse with the hacking, adding wireless hacking to facilitate up to the minute thievery. Part of what was hurting them in this case is that my Copyrights are so old that it predates their later illegally obtained and reregistered, deliberate rip offs BY YEARS, which gave away what they had and have been doing. The are sickly determined to get the newer copyrights I author, right as I type them on the screen, which is absolutely criminal.

DNS ATTACK ON SERVER - I upgraded security on my computer a week ago, to try to block out the commissioned hacker from the legal case from tampering with the site. It worked for a little bit, but then hours later after I published the updates last week, without hacker interference for a change, a telling thing happened.

My web site host Go Daddy suffered a terrible Denial of Service attack, that knocked my site offline from the internet and slowed down and clogged up their email accounts for hours. Go Daddy confirmed by email that this happened on Sunday. A Denial of Service attack is a hacker deliberately and fraudulently sending too many requests at once to a server, to try to take a web site offline illegally. This conduct is a federal crime.

The Go Daddy site was still online, but one of their servers with my site on it, clearly the one targeted, was knocked offline. Those of you who tried to access the site last Sunday couldn't for several hours because of the Denial of Service attack. The last time this happened was when I asked the public to boycott Madonna's rip off Confessions on a Dance Floor CD, which later, according to Reuters, flopped in America.

My ISP confirmed the hacker is hacking my computer from "another network provider." One thing's for certain, all this criminal mischief is coming from the same place and bears the same pattern of textbook cult like misconduct. 


3-1-07 PLEASE BOYCOTT Hillary Duff CD "Dignity"

There are a few more infringements I spotted recently. Three songs that I have read the lyrics to, of 5, from Hillary Duff's forthcoming CD, bear serious infringements. The songs are titled "Where's Your Dignity," "Happy" and "Burned" and are direct rip offs of songs from my Copyright Catalog.

She is such a fraud, claiming she wrote them. The nerve of that phony little witch. She's no better than the rest of the crooks in Hollywood, though she pretends to be so innocent.

Duff was in the film Madonna and her company Maverick stole from my Copyrighted Catalog, and changed the name from Contemporary Girl to Material Girl to Material Girls. I wrote about it a few months ago on the lawsuit page.  

Not to mention, Duff's new song "With Love" rips off Sade's "Nothing Can Come Between Us." So I guess she is now one of the industry's latest thieves.


2-6-07 PLEASE BOYCOTT New E! show "Boulevard Of Broken Dreams"

A new E! produced show titled "Boulevard Of Broken Dreams" is a rip off of a documentary I copyrighted almost a year ago titled "City Of Broken Dreams." The content and names of the projects are extremely similar, containing duplicates, even focusing on the same stars. The new E! knock off premiered last week and is about the same thing as my documentary I copyrighted way before their show was even thought up and put into production.

Once again, Madonna is still criminally using my copyrighted catalog in willful, flagrant violation of international law. My project is copyrighted and unreleased, but they gained a copy of it through illegal hacking and used it in criminal violation of the law (see hacking reports confirming how these copyrights are being illegally access then used, as confirmed by computer specialists click here.

I also bought the name for mine back in the first week of July 2006. I filmed for it and worked on it during my trip to L.A. last June that I wrote about here. Here is the name registration for my documentary film "City Of Broken Dreams" they ripped off, from 7 months ago, registered in my company's name, Sonustar:


1-5-06 Another Rip Off Via A Madonna Business Tie Judith Regan And Regan Books

BOYCOTT REGAN BOOKS  WWW.REGANBOOKS.COM

Please boycott the recently released book "Beauty Buyble" published by Madonna business associate Judith Regan (she was behind Madonna's "Sex" Book), which is a sacrilegiously titled rip off of one of my forthcoming books, "Beauty" that's been copyrighted for over 2 years. "Beauty" is a godly book I did on beauty that Judith's "Beauty Buyble"  has ripped off to the tee, even disrespecting my religion, Christianity, with that irreverent title, which they probably thought was cute and funny. Guess God got the last laugh, cause Judith Regan just got fired, is being international ripped to shreds with her reputation gone over the O.J. Simpson book and TV special "If I Did It" that blew up in her face. You proved the Bible right Judith. It says "God is not mocked" and "the works of a man's hands come back to him. You're living proof of that.

Ms. Regan is clearly a woman with no morals or ethics. I shouldn't be surprised that she feloniously bought a criminal rip off of my forthcoming copyrighted book "Beauty" from the copyrights Madonna stole and has been fencing around the industry, and put it out via Regan Books and News Corp.

If Ms. Regan read her Buyble Bible, she would know God doesn't bless unethical conduct. What comes around goes around...

Like profiting off a book that was criminal stolen from a Copyrighted Catalog of works, and sold to you, with your full knowledge that you were unlawfully buying an illegally procured version of unreleased pre-existing copyrighted material.

And even worse, profiting off of a book and TV special that disrespects viciously murdered victims, spitting on their caskets. That money is not gonna do you and your family a drop of good, because it's blood money. It didn't do Judas any good and it certainly won't do you any good either.


12-30-06 - Met Police Report I Filed On 10/17/05

For A scanned copy of the complaint I filed with the Met Police UK on October 17, 2005, alleging that Madonna and the Sun Newspaper owned by News Group Newspapers, illegally wiretapped my phones, hacked my computers, and printed the illegally obtained contents therein via theft and harassment, constituting copyright infringement, click here.

Several months after I filed the complaint, the Met Police arrested one of News Group Newspaper editors on charges he "wiretapped" and "hacked" the royal family - the very same allegations I accused them of and sued them for months before the story broke in regards to me. I feel somewhat vindicated that the editor has since admitted he did indeed "wiretap" and "hack" the royal family, showing a clear pattern of misconduct present at News Group Newspapers against innocent, unsuspecting people.


12-04-06 - Defendant Gwen Stefani Steals More Music From This Web Site      

PLEASE BOYCOTT GWEN STEFANI'S CD "SWEET ESCAPE" BEING RELEASED THIS WEEK, AS IT CONTAINS MUSIC SHE STOLE FROM THIS SITE. 

Before, where they ripped off beats and melodies from my song Contemporary Girl, Gwen has now greedily gone all the way and stole lyrics, more melodies and music from my song that was copyrighted in 2001 for "Orange County Girl."  

I will post the lyric comparisons between my song and her rip off shortly along with my copyright certificate.

My godmother’s husband, Clement Dodd, invented Jamaican reggae and ska music, which No Doubt exploited and became rich off, despite their very basic skills.  

Now it has extended to No Doubt via Gwen Stefani exploiting Jamaicans, in criminally ripping off copyrights from years of my labor to extend her run of fame. That song was copyrighted in 2001, you criminal. Copyright infringement is a crime. 

my copyright certificate for "Contemporary Girl" from 2001

Below is Gwen Stefani's illiterate, profanity laced, vulgar rip off of a Christian song I wrote years ago, "Contemporary Girl," and dedicated to God. Yea, look for more misfortune to hit your life than Herod for ripping of something dedicated to God. Only trash does stuff like that and clearly a devilish one as well with no morals. You disgust me - you an your contemptible family of minority exploiting thieves. You nasty little fraud.

Once again, it is produced by that thief defendant Pharrell Williams, who is known in the industry for ripping off indie musicians then reselling their music for $200,000, which is a crime. He and Stefani have criminally ripped me off twice now.

I've not heard her whole garbage album yet, but I did hear "Orange County Girl" and instantly spotted the rip offs, which are as follows. If you listen to the songs, they are both sung the same, both have the same lyrics, melodies, song structure and music under it - only I wrote and copyrighted mine years ago in 2001.

The titles even sound the same when you drop the Orange "Contemporary Girl" (2001) and "Orange County Girl" (2006). Here are the lyrical comparisons that show they blatant, lazy copying by that lazy, money grubbing, un-creative, non-singing skank (I've put the ripped off lyrics in boldface to help you see it easier):

Contemporary Girl (2001) by Aisha

Orange County Girl (2006) by Gwen Stefani

La La La

La La La La 

Chorus:
Contemporary girl
Living in this world

Chorus:
I'm just an Orange
County girl
Living in an extraordinary world
 

Being an old fashioned girl
Isn't so bad

I guess being I'm an orange county girl
it's not so bad

And how long you've been trippin'

I'm trippin' on the best trip I've ever had

I know that's not how you want to be

Tryin' to figure out what I wanna be

Tryin' to wear the pants

Tryin' to figure out what I wanna be

...extraordinary mask

...extraordinary world

So ladies, sing it with me

Sing it And then the girls sing

With the life that you're selling

Hangin' at the hotel, selling...

Like in love
What are we thinking
of

You know I come from O.C. it's almost unheard of
So I'm gonna thank you all so much for this
love

Why ya wanna trip

I'm trippin' on the best trip I've ever had

OTHER SIMILARITIES

In Contemporary Girl I write about the movie "Home Alone":

If you wanna be a feminist
Do it on your own
And you'll be like that movie
Home Alone

In Orange Country Girl she writes about the movie "The Sound Of Music":

These are a few of my favorite things
Still rolling 'cause the sound of music

 

In Contemporary Girl I make reference to the weather in the form of Earthquakes in California on the San Andreas fault, ironically where she is from:

 

"He shakes in the dust like you're San Andreas