Two weeks ago I received a letter stating the Supreme Court denied the case. I'm not surprised. I realized the Supreme Court was corrupt when certain decisions they kept pushing out was condemned by the public, and denying the case of Lewis Perdue, who Dan Brown blatantly STOLE SEVERAL HUNDRED COPYRIGHTED ITEMS FROM to make the Da Vinci Code book. Perdue copyrighted and published his books 20 years before Dan Brown stole them.

The courts side with the money coming into the Treasury, not justice. Besides, the Supreme Court only takes cases they feel will get their faces in the paper. They are not following Rule 10.

If they can grant Anna Nicole Smith's case, where her abandoned husband expressly left her out of his billion dollar will, for how she married him then took off, with the Justices going against the man's wishes, to give her another shot at stealing a family's fortune in court that she did not earn nor was she entitled to, then in the next breath deny petitions from people on death row whose lives are at stake and are emphatically stating they have been wrongfully sentenced to death, it says they are corrupt. You're better off giving your money to charity than filing a case with them ($400 fee). 

Not only are the preparation requirements for filing unnecessarily stringent and insufferable (do you know how many printing companies I took my petition to with the Supreme Court's instructions, that kept asking me, "what is wrong with these people," "why do they want all that?" and "what does that mean," for requesting such a layout and set up).

From the double sided printing on irregular sized paper, to the expensive 65 pound card stock paper they require, to the particular binding and excessive amount of copies (40 for the Supreme Court, plus 3 for each defendant) they aren't paying attention to justice matters, requesting all that, then churning out corruption on top of it.

They have another agenda and a corrupt one (for further reference see the race based school initiative designed to level the playing field, that the Supreme Court shotdown a few weeks ago, which drew condemnation in Congress).

Justices Alito and Roberts, you know the one that fell 10 feet this week, hit his head, was foaming at the mouth, had a seizure and was hospitalized, abstained from my case, according to the letter I received from the Supreme Court.

But I do think he slipped and bumped his head metaphorically as well, as the popular phrase goes, as he is responsible for that corrupt court and that's a cowardly, spineless, wimpy cop out. It screams corruption. You've protected the criminals and it is duly reflected in my forthcoming book and will be as well in my film about the case.

I guess them abstaining is supposed to absolve them of guilt, in that a person has been abused, assaulted on the same street as a U.S. court house, criminally defrauded out of billions in Copyrights that were devalued by lawbreaking stars and Hollywood executives, with her privacy and that of her family vilely violated, all in relation to the same case (Anthony Pellicano style), in your metaphorical house, on your watch, but you willfully ignored it, so you're not responsible, though you are the head of the court. Right. God don't like ugly, as the phrase goes and people reap what they sow. 

Not to worry, the international lawsuits are going to begin soon. They will be handled by lawyers and run as long as they need to, in as many venues as they need to, to get this matter resolved. So this thing is truly just getting started. Updates of developments in the case will be posted to the web site.

The UN complaint will be posted first and shortly.

I've also finished the book Justice And Truth, which is about the case and everything's in it. It's 200 plus pages and lays bare what happened, in all its ugly detail, blow by blow, including the massive corruption that allowed and condoned these very serious crimes, that goes further than I have made public (the UN complaint will reveal some of said additional crimes shortly, then the book fully). It's a real eye opener and you will never look at the system the same again after reading it.  

Since the Supreme Court's corrupt conduct, Madonna and some of the defendants from the case, have interpreted it as free rein to steal more copyrights, which they did, but I am asking you to keep boycotting them. I will post the recently announced forthcoming infringements I've found shortly. 

Since the boycott began in 2005, the albums and films stolen and listed on here as such, have all flopped. Thanks to all who boycotted them. They have lost far more than they have gained through breaking the law at my expense. Stealing from my Copyrighted Catalog has been costing them money and their credibility, as attested by numerous items online about the case.  

Warner Music Group, the main offender that Madonna records for, has seen their stock price go from $25 a share to $12 a share and declining. Madonna's album flopped, Kelly Clarkson's album that has lyrics from my Copyrighted Catalog illegally strewn all over it flopped and she was forced to cancel her tour due to poor ticket sales, Hillary Duff's album flopped, Stefani's album did poorly, falling out of the charts and failing to yield a real hit, Beyonce's re-release CD/DVD with the infringing music videos and songs bombed and was then pulled, and Rihanna's album has flopped, as it has been out for months, run out of steam and has not even crossed gold when they were expecting double platinum, leaving Def Jam disappointed (airplay can be manipulated, as the payola scandal of 2006 revealed):

JAY Z'S UPSET OVER RIHANNA'S POOR ALBUM SALES

"[Def Jam] has already sent out emails and made phone calls to producers and writers looking for a new female act to sign - to restart what failed with Teairra Marie and Rihanna. Everyone over here is really disappointed in Rihannas lackluster album sales. Considering that umbrella has been number one for so long and received so much positive feedback from radio, we thought it would should have done much better than 160,000 first week." - MTO