|
|
.....
|
Gonzales Contradicts Himself...And He's Not Even In Congress Yet April 17. 2007 Alberto: where's Johnny Cochran when you need him.
Boy, this doesn't look good (shakes head), but look at the bright side Gonzo, at least hangings have been outlawed...(tell that to Saddam): EXCLUSIVE: Gonzales Contradicts His Own Testimony Recently Released E-Mails Show Attorney General's Involvement in Attorney Firing Talks
By JAN CRAWFORD GREENBURG and ARIANE de VOGUE
That e-mail said that Gonzales supported firing one
federal prosecutor six months before she was asked to leave.
When Gonzales appears before the committee, a
central focus will be the extent of his involvement in the firings. The e-mail, which came from Gonzales aide Kyle Sampson, appeared to contradict the prepared written testimony Gonzales submitted to Congress over the weekend in advance of his Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Tuesday. In his prepared testimony, Gonzales said that during the months that his senior staff was evaluating U.S. attorneys, including Lam, "I did not make the decisions about who should or should not be asked to resign." But the recently released e-mail from Sampson, dated June 1, 2006, indicated that Gonzales was actively involved in discussions about Lam and had decided to fire her if she did not improve. In the e-mail to other top Justice Department officials, Sampson outlined several steps that Gonzales suggested, culminating in Lam's replacement if she failed to bolster immigration enforcement. "AG [Attorney General] has given additional thought to the San Diego situation and now believes that we should adopt a plan" that would lead to her removal if she "balks" at immigration reform, Sampson wrote. The e-mail laid out other possible ways to deal with Lam short of dismissal. Gonzales supported the idea of first having "a heart to heart with Lam about the urgent need to improve immigration enforcement" and of working with her "to develop a plan for addressing the problem." Sampson said another alternative would be to "put her on a very short leash. "If she balks on any of the foregoing or otherwise does not perform in a measurable way … remove her," Sampson wrote of Gonzales' suggested plan. "AG then appoints new U.S. [attorney] from outside the office." The Lam situation gets to the heart of the U.S. attorney controversy and the focus of the upcoming Gonzales hearing. Senators want to know why the eight prosecutors were fired. Were they fired for cause? Was their performance at issue? Or were their political motives? Regarding Lam's dismissal, the e-mails show that Sampson asked Justice Department officials William Mercer and Michael Elston for help in presenting a formal plan for Gonzales to approve. Justice Department official William W. Mercer told congressional investigators on April 11 that he attended a meeting with the attorney general days later to discuss Lam's situation, according to congressional sources. During the meeting, Mercer told Gonzales he was "very concerned" with the problems regarding Lam. In an e-mail released in the recent document dump from Capitol Hill, Mercer's calendar includes a notation for a 3 p.m. meeting on June 5 -- four days after Sampson's e-mail -- with the attorney general, Sampson, Mercer and Jeff Taylor. The subject of the meeting is listed as "Immigration Enforcement/San Diego USAO [U.S. attorney's office]."
Interestingly, in an e-mail six months earlier,
Sampson listed Taylor, who was then a top aide to Gonzales, as a possible
replacement for Lam's seat. Taylor was later appointed U.S. attorney in
Washington. |
|
© Copyright 2007 - 2010. AG All Rights Reserved. Web site design by Aisha for SONUSTAR INTERACTIVE SITES: AISHA | AISHA BLOG | AISHA BLOG ARCHIVE | SONUSTAR | SONUSTAR NEWS | JUDICIARY REPORT | SOUND OFF COLUMN | CELLULOID FILM REVIEW | COMPENDIUS | UNITED PEACE INITIATIVE | CONSUMER NEWS REVIEWS |